Articles | Volume 383
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-383-213-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-383-213-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Ensemble flood simulation for the typical catchment in humid climatic zone by using multiple hydrological models
Jie Wang
State Key Laboratory of Hydrology–Water Resources and Hydraulic
Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China
Yangtze Institute for Conservation and Development, Nanjing 210098, China
School of Resource and Earth Science, China University of Mining and
Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Jianyun Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Hydrology–Water Resources and Hydraulic
Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China
Yangtze Institute for Conservation and Development, Nanjing 210098, China
State Key Laboratory of Hydrology–Water Resources and Hydraulic
Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China
Yangtze Institute for Conservation and Development, Nanjing 210098, China
Xiaomeng Song
State Key Laboratory of Hydrology–Water Resources and Hydraulic
Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China
Yangtze Institute for Conservation and Development, Nanjing 210098, China
School of Resource and Earth Science, China University of Mining and
Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Xiaoying Yang
State Key Laboratory of Hydrology–Water Resources and Hydraulic
Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
Yueyang Wang
Yangtze Institute for Conservation and Development, Nanjing 210098, China
Geographical Science School, Nanjing University of Information Science
and Technology, 210029, China
Related authors
No articles found.
Xiongpeng Tang, Guobin Fu, Silong Zhang, Chao Gao, Guoqing Wang, Zhenxin Bao, Yanli Liu, Cuishan Liu, and Junliang Jin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5315–5339, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5315-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5315-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we proposed a new framework that considered the uncertainties of model simulations in quantifying the contribution rate of climate change and human activities to streamflow changes. Then, the Lancang River basin was selected for the case study. The results of quantitative analysis using the new framework showed that the reason for the decrease in the streamflow at Yunjinghong station was mainly human activities.
Shanlin Tong, Weiguang Wang, Jie Chen, Chong-Yu Xu, Hisashi Sato, and Guoqing Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7075–7098, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7075-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7075-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Plant carbon storage potential is central to moderate atmospheric CO2 concentration buildup and mitigation of climate change. There is an ongoing debate about the main driver of carbon storage. To reconcile this discrepancy, we use SEIB-DGVM to investigate the trend and response mechanism of carbon stock fractions among water limitation regions. Results show that the impact of CO2 and temperature on carbon stock depends on water limitation, offering a new perspective on carbon–water coupling.
Kang Xie, Pan Liu, Qian Xia, Xiao Li, Weibo Liu, Xiaojing Zhang, Lei Cheng, Guoqing Wang, and Jianyun Zhang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-217, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-217, 2022
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
There are currently no available common datasets of the Soil moisture storage capacity (SMSC) on a global scale, especially for hydrological models. Here, we produce a dataset of the SMSC parameter for global hydrological models. The global SMSC is constructed based on the deep residual network at 0.5° resolution. SMSC products are validated on global grids and typical catchments from different climatic regions.
Na Yang, Jianyun Zhang, Jiufu Liu, Guodong Liu, Aimin Liao, and Guoqing Wang
Proc. IAHS, 383, 99–110, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-383-99-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-383-99-2020, 2020
Pengcheng Xu, Dong Wang, Vijay P. Singh, Yuankun Wang, Jichun Wu, Huayu Lu, Lachun Wang, Jiufu Liu, and Jianyun Zhang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-358, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-358, 2019
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, a multivariate nonstationary risk analysis of annual extreme rainfall events, extracted from daily precipitation data observed at six meteorological stations in Haihe River basin, China, was done in three phases: (1) Several statistical tests, were applied to both the marginal distributions and the dependence structures to decipher different forms of nonstationarity; (2) Time-dependent copulas were adopted to model the distribution structure.
Wenqing Shi, Qiuwen Chen, Jianyun Zhang, Cheng Chen, Yuchen Chen, Yuyu Ji, Juhua Yu, and Bryce R. Van Dam
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2018-380, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2018-380, 2018
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
As the second most important greenhouse gas, the production of methane undermines the green credentials of hydropower. We investigated methane emissions from a reservoir island and discovered self-mitigation of methane emissions in a ring-like zone around the island edge. Understanding the self-mitigation of methane emissions in dammed rivers will help to screen effective strategies for lessening the global warming effects of hydropower systems.
Binquan Li, Changchang Zhu, Zhongmin Liang, Guoqing Wang, and Yu Zhang
Proc. IAHS, 379, 403–407, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-379-403-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-379-403-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Differences between meteorological and hydrological droughts could reflect the regional water consumption by both natural elements and human water-use. The connections between these two drought types were analyzed using the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) and Standardized Streamflow Index (SSI), respectively, in a typical semi-arid basin of the middle Yellow River.
Xiao-Jun Wang, Jian-Yun Zhang, Shamsuddin Shahid, Yu-Xuan Xie, and Xu Zhang
Proc. IAHS, 376, 51–55, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-376-51-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-376-51-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
A statistical model has been developed for forecasting domestic water demand in Haihe river basin of China due to population growth, technological advances and climate change. Historical records of domestic water use, climate, population and urbanization are used for the development of model. An ensemble of seven general circulation models (GCMs) namely, BCC-CSM1-1, BNU-ESM, CNRM-CM5, GISS-E2-R, MIROC-ESM, PI-ESM-LR, MRI-CGCM3 were used for the projection of climate and the changes in water demand.
Cited articles
Andrew, W. R., Upmanu, L., Stephen, E. Z., and Balaji, R.: Categorical
climate forecasts through optimal combination of multiple GCM ensembles,
World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, 130, 1792–1811,
https://doi.org/10.1061/40685(2003)184, 2003.
Arsenault, R., Gatien, P., Renaud, B., Brissette, F., and Martel, J. L.: A
comparative analysis of 9 multimodel averaging approaches in hydrological
continuous streamflow simulation, J. Hydrol., 529, 754–767,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.001, 2005.
Arsenault, R., Gilles, R. C., and Francois, P. B.: Improving hydrological
model simulations with combined multi-Input and multimodel averaging
frameworks, J. Hydrol. Eng., 22, 66–76,
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001489, 2017.
Balint, G., Csik, A., Bartha, P., Gauzer, B., and Bonta, I.: Application of
meterological ensembles for Danube flood forecasting and warning, in:
Transboundary floods: Reducing
risks through flood management, edited by: Marsalek, J., Stancalie, G., and Balint, G., Springer, NATO Science Series, Dordecht, the
Netherlands, 57–68, 2006.
Bao, W.: Hydrological forecasting (4th Edn.), China Water Conservancy and
Hydropower Press, China, 141–142, 2009.
Bates, J. M. and Granger, C. W. J.: The combination of forecasts, Oper.
Res. Aquart., 20, 451–468, 1969.
Burnash, R. J. C.: The NWS river forecast system-catchment modeling, in:
Computer models of watershed hydrology, edited by: Singh, V. P., Water Resour.
Publ. Am., 4, 311–366, 1995.
Cloke, H. L. and Pappenberger, F.: Ensemble flood forecasting: A review,
J. Hydrol., 375, 613–626, 2009.
Craft, T. J., Launder, B. E., and Suga, K.: Development and application of a
cubic eddy-viscosity model of turbulence, J. Heat Fluid Flow,
17, 108–115, https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-727X(95)00079-6, 1996.
Davolio, S., Miglietta, M. M., Diomede, T., Marsigli, C., Morgillo, A., and Moscatello, A.: A meteo-hydrological prediction system based on a multi-model approach for precipitation forecasting, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 8, 143–159, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-8-143-2008, 2008.
Diks, C. and Vrugt, J.: Comparison of point forecast accuracy of model
averaging methods in hydrologic applications, Stoch. Env.
Res. Risk A., 24, 809–820,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0378-z, 2010.
Epstein, E. S.: Stochastic dynamic prediction, Tellus, 21, 739–759,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1969.tb00483.x, 1969.
Guan, X., Liu, Y., Jin, J., Liu, C., Liu, Y., and Wang, G.: Hydrological
variation characteristics of typical watersheds in different climate regions
of China, Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric
Power (Natural Science Edition), 39, 13–17, 2018.
Hamill, T., Whitaker, J., and Wei, X.: Ensemble reforecasting: improving
medium-range forecast skill using retrospective forecasts, Mon. Weather
Rev., 132, 1434–1447,
2004.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Geneva Switzerland:
Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report
of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 85–88, 2014.
Jasper, K., Gurtz, J., and Lang, H.: Advanced flood forecasting in Alpine
watersheds by coupling meteorological observations and forecasts with a
distributed hydrological model, J. Hydrol., 267, 40–52,
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(02)00138-5,2002.
Leith, C. E.: Theoretical skill of Montre Carlo forecast, Mon. Weather
Rev., 102, 409–418,
1974.
Levenberg, K.: A method for the solution of certain nonlinear problems in
least squares, Q. Appl. Math.s, 2, 164–168,
https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/10666, 1944.
Lin, S.: Hydrological forecasting, 2nd Edn., China Water Conservancy
and Hydropower Press, Beijing, China, 58–62, 2003.
Marquardt, D. W.: An algorithm for least squares estimation of nonlinear
parameters, J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.,
11, 431–441, 1963.
Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China: Hydrological
yearbook published by Hydrology Bureau, China Water Conservancy Press,
China, 1981–1987.
Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China: Hydrological
information forecasting specification, China Water Conservancy Press, China, 5–6,
2008.
Mudasser, M. K, Asaad, Y. S., and Brucem, W. M.: Impact of ensemble size on
forecasting occurrence of rainfall using TIGGE precipitation forecasts,
J. Hydrol. Eng., 19, 732–738,
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000864, 2014.
Pitt, M.: Learning lessons from the 2007 floods: an independent review by Sir
Michael Pitt: interim report, UK, 32–33, 2007.
Rockwood, D. M.: Application of streamflow synthesis and reservoir regulation – SSARR-program to the lower Mekong River. The use of Analog and Digital Computers in Hydrolog, 377–378, https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(93)90010-G, 1968.
Roulin, E.: Skill and relative economic value of medium-range hydrological ensemble predictions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 725–737, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-725-2007, 2007.
Rui, X.: Hydrology principle, China Water Conservancy and Hydropower Press,
China, 3–4, 2004.
Song, X. and Kong, F.: Application of Xin'anjiang model coupling with
artificial neural networks, Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 30,
135–138, 2010.
Sugawara, M.: Analysis method of valley discharge, Koritsu publisher,
Janpan, 110–116, 1972.
Takemasa, M. and Masaru, K.: The local ensemble transform Kalman Filter
with the weather research and forecasting model: experiments with real
observations, Pure Appl. Geophys., 169, 321–333,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-011-0373-4, 2012.
Vrugt, J. A., Gupta, H. V., Nuallain, B., and Bouten, W.: Real-time data
assimilation for operational ensemble streamflow forecasting, J.
Hydrometeorol., 7, 548–565, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM504.1, 2006.
Werner, M.: FEWS NL Version 1.0 – Report Q3933, Delft Hydraulics, Delft,
2005.
Xu, Z.: Hydrological models, Science Press, China, 318–340, 2009.
Yang, X.: A review of real-time flood forecasting methods, Chinese
Hydrology, 65, 9–16, 1996.
Zhao, R.: Hydrological simulation – Xin'anjiang model and Shanbei model,
Water Power Press, Beijing, China, 106–118, 1984.
Zhao, Z.: The Foundation and Application of Fuzzy Theory and Neural Network,
Tsinghua University Press, China, 125–129, 1996.