Articles | Volume 374
Proc. IAHS, 374, 9–15, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-374-9-2016
Proc. IAHS, 374, 9–15, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-374-9-2016
 
17 Oct 2016
17 Oct 2016

Developing new scenarios for water allocation negotiations: a case study of the Euphrates River Basin

Mohammad Reza Jarkeh et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,345 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
748 532 65 1,345 91 103
  • HTML: 748
  • PDF: 532
  • XML: 65
  • Total: 1,345
  • BibTeX: 91
  • EndNote: 103
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Oct 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 Oct 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,178 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,173 with geography defined and 5 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 04 Jul 2022
Download
Short summary
In this paper we established a new method to choose the most appropriate allocating rule which seems to be more equitable and reasonable than other allocation rules to satisfy the riparian countries. To evaluate this new proposed method, we applied seven Classical Bankruptcy Rules (CBRs) and four Sequential Sharing Rules (SSRs) in allocating the Euphrates River water among three riparian countries: Turkey, Syria and Iraq.