Articles | Volume 374
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-374-9-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-374-9-2016
17 Oct 2016
 | 17 Oct 2016

Developing new scenarios for water allocation negotiations: a case study of the Euphrates River Basin

Mohammad Reza Jarkeh, Ameneh Mianabadi, and Hojjat Mianabadi

Viewed

Total article views: 1,714 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
986 633 95 1,714 118 123
  • HTML: 986
  • PDF: 633
  • XML: 95
  • Total: 1,714
  • BibTeX: 118
  • EndNote: 123
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Oct 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 Oct 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,533 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,528 with geography defined and 5 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
In this paper we established a new method to choose the most appropriate allocating rule which seems to be more equitable and reasonable than other allocation rules to satisfy the riparian countries. To evaluate this new proposed method, we applied seven Classical Bankruptcy Rules (CBRs) and four Sequential Sharing Rules (SSRs) in allocating the Euphrates River water among three riparian countries: Turkey, Syria and Iraq.