Articles | Volume 386
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-386-41-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-386-41-2024
Post-conference publication
 | 
19 Apr 2024
Post-conference publication |  | 19 Apr 2024

Performance analysis of physically-based (HEC-RAS, CADDIES) and AI-based (LSTM) flood models for two case studies

Marina Batalini de Macedo, Nikunj K. Mangukiya, Maria Clara Fava, Ashutosh Sharma, Roberto Fray da Silva, Ankit Agarwal, Maria Tereza Razzolini, Eduardo Mario Mendiondo, Narendra K. Goel, Mathew Kurian, and Adelaide Cássia Nardocci

Viewed

Total article views: 407 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
274 115 18 407 15 11
  • HTML: 274
  • PDF: 115
  • XML: 18
  • Total: 407
  • BibTeX: 15
  • EndNote: 11
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Apr 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Apr 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 391 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 391 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 14 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
More and more extreme rainfall causes flooding problems in cities and communities, affecting the health and well-being of the population, as well as causing damage to the economy. To help design actions aiming at reducing the impacts of these floods, computational models can be used to simulate their extent. However, there are different types of models currently available. In this study, we evaluated three different models, for a city in Brazil and a region in India, to guide the best use of it.