Articles | Volume 386
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-386-181-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-386-181-2024
Post-conference publication
 | 
19 Apr 2024
Post-conference publication |  | 19 Apr 2024

Flood damage model bias caused by aggregation

Seth Bryant, Heidi Kreibich, and Bruno Merz

Viewed

Total article views: 943 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
731 174 38 943 51 95
  • HTML: 731
  • PDF: 174
  • XML: 38
  • Total: 943
  • BibTeX: 51
  • EndNote: 95
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Apr 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Apr 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 913 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 913 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 22 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
Our study found that simplifying data in flood risk models can introduce errors. We tested 344 damage functions and found errors up to 40 % of the total asset value. This means large-scale flood risk assessments may have significant errors due to the modelling approach. Our research highlights the need for more attention to data aggregation in flood risk models.
Share