Articles | Volume 385
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-385-181-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Pros and cons of various efficiency criteria for hydrological model performance evaluation
Related authors
Cited articles
Alexander, D. L. J., Tropsha, A., and Winkler, D. A.: Beware of R2: simple, unambiguous assessment of the prediction accuracy of QSAR and QSPR models, J. Chem. Info. Mod., 55, 1316–1322, 2015.
Beven, J. K.: Rainfall-Runoff Modelling – The Primer, 2nd Edition, Wiley-Blackwell, 488 pp., ISBN 978-0-470-71459-1, 2012.
Beven, K. J. and Binley, A. M.: The future role of distributed models: model calibration and predictive uncertainty, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279–298, 1992.
Blöschl, G., Bierkens, F. P., Chambel, A., et al.: Twenty-three unsolved problems in hydrology (UPH) – a community perspective, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 64, 1141–1158, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1620507, 2019.
Cameron, S.: Why is the R squared adjusted reported?, J. Quant. Econ., 9, 183–186, 1993.