Articles | Volume 374
Proc. IAHS, 374, 159–163, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-374-159-2016
Proc. IAHS, 374, 159–163, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-374-159-2016
 
17 Oct 2016
17 Oct 2016

Comparison of cross-validation and bootstrap aggregating for building a seasonal streamflow forecast model

Simon Schick et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,092 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
603 403 86 1,092 93 91
  • HTML: 603
  • PDF: 403
  • XML: 86
  • Total: 1,092
  • BibTeX: 93
  • EndNote: 91
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Oct 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 Oct 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 909 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 905 with geography defined and 4 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 05 Jul 2022
Download
Short summary
In water resources management, planning at the seasonal time scale is confronted with large uncertainties. Key variables are often unknown or hard to forecast, e.g. precipitation of the next three months. In the present study, we try to highlight some aspects concerning the development of a model faced with these uncertainties. Using the example of statistical streamflow forecasts, the results of the study indicate that the forecast accuracy is improved by the combination of several models.