Articles | Volume 382
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-382-669-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.A social costs and benefits analysis of peat soil-subsidence towards 2100 in 4 scenarios
Related authors
Cited articles
AGV: Waterbetrokken, Bestuursakkoord Waterschap Amstel, Gooi en Vecht
2019–2023, available at: (last access: 2 March 2020), 2019.
Jurasinski, G., Günther, A., Huth, V., Couwenberg, J., and Glatzel,
S.: 5.1 Greenhouse gas emissions, in: Chap. 5 Ecosystem services
provided by paludiculture, Paludiculture – productive use of wet
35 peatlands, Climate protection – biodiversity – regional economic
benefits, edited by: Wichtmann, E., Schröder, and Joosten, H.,
Schweizerbart Science Publishers, Stuttgart, 79–93, 2016.
Troost, S., Kuipers, H., and Hoefsloot, N.: Toekomstverkenning bodemdaling
AGV, Maatschappelijke kosten en baten analyse, Aveco De Bondt, in opdracht
van Waternet, Internal publication, 2018.
Waterschap Stichtse Rijnlanden: Re:peat a model for soil subsidence in
peat meadow area, available at:
https://www.hdsr.nl/beleid-plannen/veenweide/onderzoeken/re-peat/ (last access: 2 March 2020), 2017.
Wosten, J. H. M., de Vries, F., Hoogland, T., Massop, H. T. L., Veldhuizen,
A. A., Vroon, H. R. J., Wesseling, J. G., Heijkers, J., and Bolman, A.:
BOFEK2012, de nieuwe bodemfysische schematisatie van Nederland, Wageningen,
Alterra (Alterra-rapport 2387) – 46, available at:
https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/bofek2012-de-nieuwe-bodemfysische-schematisatie-van-nederland (last access: 2 March 2020), 2013.