<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \bartext{Land use and climate change impacts on erosion and sediment transport}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">PIAHS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">PIAHS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Proc. IAHS</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2199-899X</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/piahs-381-87-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Contemporary suspended sediment yield<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> of Caucasus mountains</article-title><alt-title>Contemporary suspended sediment yield of Caucasus mountains</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Contemporary suspended sediment yield of Caucasus mountains}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~Tsyplenkov et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Tsyplenkov</surname><given-names>Anatoly</given-names></name>
          <email>atsyplenkov@gmail.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4144-8402</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Vanmaercke</surname><given-names>Matthias</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Golosov</surname><given-names>Valentin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991
Moscow, Russian Federation</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119017 Moscow,
Russian Federation</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Département de Géographie, Université de Liège, Clos
Mercator 3, 4000 Liège, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Anatoly Tsyplenkov (atsyplenkov@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>1</day><month>August</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>381</volume>
      <fpage>87</fpage><lpage>93</lpage>
      
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e100">Processes linked to climate change and intensified
anthropogenic pressure influence the environment, the hydrology and by
extent the denudation processes in the Caucasus mountain belt. Quantitative
assessments of sediment fluxes and their temporal evolution in this mountain
region are required for various environmental and engineering purposes,
including the planning and maintenance of water reservoirs and other
structures. In this paper, we present a first analysis of the hitherto
largest suspended sediment yield (<italic>SSY</italic>) database for the Caucasus region,
comprising data from 198 catchments (&gt; 4000 catchment-years of
observations). We present an overview of the existing contemporary <italic>SSY</italic> data
from gauging stations observations. Based on these data and different
models, we propose preliminary maps of the spatial patterns of <italic>SSY</italic> and
denudation rates in the Caucasus region.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e121">Denudation rates in the mountains are controlled by both endogenic and
exogenic factors. Endogenic factors include the degree of tectonic uplift
and seismic activity and are typically considered to be the dominant driving
force of denudation rates in tectonically active mountain ranges
(e.g. Malamud et al., 2004; Montgomery and
Brandon, 2002). Nonetheless, also exogenic factors play a crucial role.
These include climatic conditions and vegetation cover
(e.g. Syvitski and Milliman, 2007). They are
especially key factors to understand temporal trends in sediment fluxes and
denudation rates at contemporary time scales.</p>
      <p id="d1e124">The Caucasus mountains are a highly tectonically and seismically active
region, resulting most probably in high long-term denudation rates. At the
same time, patterns and trends of climate and vegetation cover likely also
exert significant control on suspended sediment yields (<italic>SSY</italic>, [t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]) at annual to decadal timescales.
Disentangling the role of tectonic and geomorphic controls <italic>SSY</italic> from the role of
climate and land cover is a central challenge
(e.g.
Syvitski and Milliman, 2007; Vanmaercke et al., 2015). This is not only of
fundamental scientific importance but also of great relevance from a
catchment and water resources management perspective (e.g. for the
construction and maintenance of water reservoirs). This challenge is
especially pertinent in the light of ongoing climate change and increasing
anthropogenic pressure (including land use/land cover changes).</p>
      <p id="d1e157">A key obstacle in addressing this research challenge is the availability of
sufficient and reliable <italic>SSY</italic> observations in order to statistically discern the
relative importance of its different driving factors (e.g. Vanmaercke et
al., 2011, 2015). Here we aim to help addressing this gap by quantitatively
assessing the spatial patterns of contemporary <italic>SSY</italic> in the Caucasus region,
based on a large dataset of gauging stations observations from mid the
1920 to 2015.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
      <p id="d1e174">A large number of studies focussed on compiling and understanding patterns
of <italic>SSY</italic> at regional to global scales. Several of these also consider (parts of)
the Caucasus region
(Dedkov
and Moszherin, 1984, 1992; Jaoshvili, 2002; Milliman and Syvitski, 1992;
Vanmaercke et al., 2011). We developed a comprehensive database of
contemporary <italic>SSY<?pagebreak page88?></italic> observations for the Caucasus mountains by integrating these
existing datasets and complementing them with hydrological observations at
gauging stations in the Russian Federation (State Water Cadastre;
<uri>https://gmvo.skniivh.ru/</uri>, last access: 19 June 2019) as well as <italic>SSY</italic> observations for specific catchments
reported by individual studies
(Abduev, 2015; Eyubova, 2015; Khmeleva
et al., 2000; Magritskii, 2011).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e192">SSY database overview (with outliers).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Country</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number of</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Data sources</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">catchments</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(catchment – years)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Abhazia (part of Georgia)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6 (54)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Khmeleva et. al. (2000), Dedkov and Mozherin (1984)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Armenia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25 (NA)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Dedkov and Mozherin (1984)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Azerbaijan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">54 (466)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">State water cadastre; Eyubova (2015), Abduev (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Georgia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22 (NA)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Dedkov and Mozherin (1984)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Russia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">91 (3491)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Magritskii (2011); State water cadastre;</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TOTAL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">198 (4011)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><uri>https://gmvo.skniivh.ru/</uri> (last access: 19 June 2019)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e195">NA: not available.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e331">Given that these observations were derived from different sources, also the
reliability of the resulting <italic>SSY</italic> varies. This reliability depends on the
measuring procedure and especially the sampling frequency
(e.g. Moatar et al., 2006). However, also the
length of the <italic>SSY</italic> observation periods is an essential factor. Vanmaercke et al. (2012) showed that uncertainties on average <italic>SSY</italic> values based on a short
measuring period (1–5 years) due to inter-annual variations in sediment
yield are typically at least as large as the uncertainty relating to the
measuring period. Moreover, such average <italic>SSY</italic> values are relatively more likely
to underestimate the actual average <italic>SSY</italic> (Vanmaercke et al., 2012). Given these
concerns, we only considered catchment <italic>SSY</italic> values from direct gauging station
(<italic>GS</italic>) observations with a measuring period (<italic>MP</italic>) of at least 10 years.</p>
      <p id="d1e360">In total, our Caucasus database comprised <italic>SSY</italic> observations for 198 catchments.
An overview of the data is given in  Table 1, while the temporal
coverage of the database is shown in  Fig. 1. The sum of all <italic>MP</italic>s
yields a total of 4011 catchment-years of observations. However, for
several entries from Dedkov and Moszherin (1984) start and end
date was unknown. We assumed a value of 10 years for such entries. With
respect to catchment sizes, 17 <italic>GS</italic>s have a catchment area &lt; 100 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 101 <italic>GS</italic>s have a catchment area between 100 and 1000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 64
between 1000 and 10 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 16 have a catchment area &gt; 10 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. 2).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e414">Temporal coverage of the Caucasus <italic>SSY</italic> database. A: distribution of
the measuring periods for which gauging station <italic>SSY</italic> observations are available.
B: amount of catchment-year <italic>SSY</italic> data available per 5-year period.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/381/87/2019/piahs-381-87-2019-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e434">Distribution of <italic>SSY</italic> observations in our database <bold>(a)</bold> and boxplots of
elevations of the gauging stations <bold>(b)</bold> and their catchment areas <bold>(c)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/381/87/2019/piahs-381-87-2019-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e455">Overall, SSY values ranged between 3.6 and 4100 t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with an average value of 442 t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a median of 197 t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Two catchments in our database had an
exceptionally low <italic>SSY</italic> value (respectively 3.6 and 3.9 t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). These two catchments were located in the
submontane zone of Azerbaijan and Armenia. Given that these <italic>SSY</italic> are clearly
lower than what can be expected for this kind of environments (e.g.
Vanmaercke et al., 2011) and the reliability of these observations could be
questioned, these two observations were not considered for further analyses.
According to a Shapiro-Wilks test, the SSY observations are log-normally
distributed. All further analyses were therefore conducted on the log<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
of the <italic>SSY</italic>.</p>
      <p id="d1e574">In order to visualize and better understand the patterns of <italic>SSY</italic> in the
Caucasus, we used several methods to spatially interpolate
log<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<italic>SSY</italic>). These included Ordinary Kriging (<italic>OK</italic>), Co-Kriging with an
elevation as a co-variable (<italic>CK-h</italic>) and Co-Kriging with a Mean Local Relief as a
co-variable (<italic>CK-mlr</italic>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-nearest neighbors (<italic>KNN</italic>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-nearest neighbors with a
co-variable (<italic>KKN-h, KKN-mlr</italic>). <italic>OK</italic>, <italic>CK</italic>, <italic>CK-h</italic> and <italic>CK-mlr</italic> were performed with the R package <italic>automap</italic>
(Hiemstra et al., 2009), <italic>KNN</italic>, <italic>KKN-h</italic>, and <italic>KKN-mlr</italic>
with the R package <italic>kknn</italic>  (Schliep and Hechenbichler, 2016). Elevation
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, [m]) and Mean Local Relief (<italic>MLR</italic>, [m]) were chosen as an auxiliary variables
due to their expected correlation with <italic>SSY</italic>
(Ahnert, 1970; Milliman
and Syvitski, 1992; Montgomery and Brandon, 2002). Elevation data was
accessed with the <italic>elevatr</italic> package  (Hollister and Tarak Shah, 2017) in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. <italic>MLR</italic> was calculated as a difference between maximum and minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> within a 10 km buffer as it was suggested by Montgomery and Brandon (2002). We randomly split our database into two datasets: one for training
and one for validation (Table 2).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e689">Ranges and characteristics of the observed suspended sediment
yields and the generated training and validation datasets (without outliers).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number of</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SSY<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SSY<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SSY<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mean</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SSY<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">med</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">catchments</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Train</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">156</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">470</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">204</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">660</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Validation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1650</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">354</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">164</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">400</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TOTAL dataset</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">196</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">446</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">620</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e968">The performance of these interpolations was assessed based on the root mean
square error (<italic>RMSE</italic>), the mean error (<italic>ME</italic>), the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (<italic>NSE</italic>;
(Nash and Sutcliffe, 1970), the coefficient of
determination (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Spearman's coefficient of correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e998">To assess the total sediment load of the Caucasus, the sediment export of a
catchment (<italic>SSL</italic>, t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated as:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M38" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">SSL</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">SSY</mml:mtext><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        with: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> – the catchment area [km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]. If there were several <italic>GS</italic> at one river we
considered the most downstream station (with the largest catchment area) for
calculating <italic>SSL</italic>. For the ungauged basins we made estimate based on our
interpolation. We calculate an average <italic>SSY</italic> for every ungauged basin draining to
the exit of our study area and multiply this with the size of the basin in
order to have an estimate of the <italic>SSL</italic>. To<?pagebreak page89?> define basin borders for the ungauged
watersheds we used HydroBasins level 5  (Lehner and Grill, 2013).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e1083">The results of the six interpolation methods (<italic>OK</italic>, <italic>CK-h</italic>, <italic>CK-mlr</italic>, <italic>KNN</italic>, <italic>KNN-h</italic>, <italic>KNN-mlr</italic>) are shown in Table 3. Overall, these results show that observed <italic>SSY</italic> values are strongly spatially
correlated. As such, about 70 % of the observed spatial variation in <italic>SSY</italic> can
be estimated based on a spatial extrapolation of observations from other
<italic>GS</italic>. This is shown by both the <italic>KNN</italic> and <italic>OK</italic> approach. Adding the considered
co-variable (elevation or Mean Local Relief) slightly improves the
prediction quality, but also significantly changes the simulated spatial
pattern of <italic>SSY</italic>. The <italic>CK</italic> approach shows the best training results in terms of
<italic>NSE</italic>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values but clearly performs worse in terms of validation. The
<italic>KNN-h</italic> approach shows the smallest difference between training and validation
metrics: both <italic>NSE</italic> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are above average. Moreover, <italic>KNN-h</italic> has the best results
for validation. We, therefore, considered <italic>KNN-h</italic> as the optimal approach to assess
the spatial variation of <italic>SSY</italic> in the Caucasus region. Figure 3
illustrates the simulated spatial distribution of <italic>SSY</italic> and elevation.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1181">Performance measures of the different tested interpolation methods
(see text for further details).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RMSE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ME</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NSE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KNN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Train</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0055</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.84</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Validation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.033</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.87</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Train</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00056</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Validation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.046</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.86</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KNN-h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Train</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0076</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.85</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Validation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.84</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CK-h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Train</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Validation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.046</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.84</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KNN-mlr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Train</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00036</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.86</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Validation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.068</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.83</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CK-mlr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Train</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Validation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.86</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1599">Overall, mean <italic>SSY</italic> values are higher in the northern part of the Caucasus (504 t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) are higher than for the
southern part (396 t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
difference is significant and not related to differences in altitude
(Fig. 3). Furthermore, <italic>SSY</italic> values are very low (&lt; 50 t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in most of Armenia and
Azerbaijan, especially in the highland steppic zone. On the other hand, the
highest values of <italic>SSY</italic> (&gt; 1000 t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) are observed in the Dagestan steppes (eastern part of the
Caucasus). Furthermore, <italic>SSY</italic> values are significantly higher in the high
mountain belt of the central part of Caucasus. This is likely due to the
presence of glaciers and the sparse vegetated cover in these headwater
catchments.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1715">Elevation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, m a.s.l.) and average annual Suspended Sediment Yields
(<italic>SSY</italic>, t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) as estimated based on our
<italic>SSY</italic> database.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/381/87/2019/piahs-381-87-2019-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1761">We estimated that the total measured suspended sediment load (<italic>SSL</italic>) from rivers
draining the Caucasus Mountains is about 98 Mt yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This
value is based on direct measurements from 196 <italic>GS</italic>, which covers 61 % of the
total area of<?pagebreak page90?> the study area. <italic>SSL</italic> of the ungauged part of the Caucasus is 50 Mt yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (based on the <italic>KNN-h</italic> interpolation).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e1809">The <italic>SSY</italic> database presented in this article is the hitherto largest in its kind.
Overall, <italic>SSY</italic> estimates for Caucasus rivers remain relatively scarcely reported
in scientific literature. Overall, the average <italic>SSY</italic> of our database (446 t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) corresponds very well to the
average <italic>SSY</italic> reported for catchments in Alpine zones in Europe (451 t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Vanmaercke et al., 2011).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1875">Spatial patterns of estimated average denudation rates for the
Caucasus (mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and comparison with the estimates of
Mozzherin and Sharifullin (2015).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/381/87/2019/piahs-381-87-2019-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1896">We also compared our findings with earlier estimates of denudation rates in
the Caucasus. One of the first assessment was made by Gabrielyan (1971), who reported a mean annual denudation rate of Caucasus
of 0.2 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Mozzherin and Sharifullin (2015) estimated that mean annual denudation rates in the
Caucasus range between 0.005 and 2.32 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. They
calculated denudation rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, [mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]) using the
following formula:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M77" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">SSY</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.65</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        To compare the results of our database with these previous findings, we
converted our <italic>SSY</italic> values to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the same equation. As such,
the mean denudation rate for the Caucasus region based on our database is
0.17 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.55 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. As indicated by  Fig. 4, the spatial patterns of our
database correspond relatively well with those estimated by
Mozzherin and Sharifullin (2015). The main difference
between their and our estimates occurs in the center of the Caucasus
(Georgia). The density of <italic>GS</italic> is scarce in this region and, as such
uncertainties are especially important in this part of the study area. Areas
having a relatively low denudation rate (e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.1 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> agree well for both approaches. However, areas
with a high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (&gt; 0.25 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) occupy 31 % of the study region according to our assessment and only 18 %
according to (Mozzherin and Sharifullin, 2015). These
differences are likely attributable to different measuring periods,
differences in interpolation methods, as well as the larger amount of
observations used in our study. As such, we believe that our assessment
provides a refinement of the earlier estimated spatial patterns of <italic>SSY</italic> for the
Caucasus region. Nonetheless, further improvement remains possible. As a
next step, we aim to include additional relevant variables (e.g. relating to
land cover, climatic conditions, lithology and soil characteristics,
topography, tectonics and seismicity) in our assessment of <italic>SSY</italic>. This may not
only improve our understanding of spatial and temporal patterns of <italic>SSY</italic> but will
also help in disentangling the relative<?pagebreak page91?> importance of endogenic and exogenic
drivers of catchment-wide denudation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2099">In this paper, we presented the hitherto largest <italic>SSY</italic> database for the Caucasus
region as well as some first explorative analyses of the spatial patterns of
<italic>SSY</italic>. We found that Caucasus <italic>SSY</italic> values are similar in range and average to those
of catchments in European alpine climatic zones. Observed <italic>SSY</italic> values are
strongly correlated in space, allowing a reasonable assessment of spatial
patterns of <italic>SSY</italic> based on a geographical interpolation of <italic>GS</italic> observations. Adding
information on elevation further improved the accuracy of our simulations.
This methodological approach in combination with the<?pagebreak page92?> hitherto largest <italic>SSY</italic> dataset
allowed to make an updated assessment of spatial patterns of <italic>SSY</italic> in the
Caucasus (Fig. 3).</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2131">Reproducible R code is available at the GitHub
repository (<uri>https://github.com/atsyplenkov/caucasus-sediment-yield</uri>) (Tsyplenkov et al., 2019). Contact
Anatoly Tsyplenkov (atsyplenkov@gmail.com) for more information.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2140">VG, AT conceived and designed the research;
AT performed the experiments and analyzed the data; AT, VG and MV wrote and
edited the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2146">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2152">This article is part of the special issue “Land use and climate change impacts on erosion and sediment transport”. It is a result of the ICCE Symposium 2018 – Climate Change Impacts on Sediment Dynamics: Measurement, Modelling and Management, Moscow, Russia, 27–31 August 2018.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2158">This study contributes to the State Task no. 0148-2019-0005, Institute of Geography RAS. The authors wish to thank Oleg P. Yermolaev
for sharing an electronic version of the Dedkov and Moszherin,
1984 database.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e2163">The work (analysis and results) was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project number 19-17-00181).</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Abduev, M. A.: Amending the runoff suspended sediment and turbidity of the
mountain rivers of Azerbaijan under the influence of economic activity,
Geogr. Bull., 32, 29–37, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ahnert, F.: Functional relationships between denudation, relief, and uplift
in large, mid-latitude drainage basins, Am. J. Sci., 268, 243–263,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.268.3.243" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2475/ajs.268.3.243</ext-link>, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dedkov, A. P. and Moszherin, V. I.: Erosion and Sediment Runoff on the Earth, Kazan: Izd-vo Kazansk. un-ta., 264 pp., 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dedkov, A. P. and Moszherin, V. I.: Erosion and sediment yield in mountain
regions of the world, Eros. Debris Flows Environ. Mt. Reg., 209, 29–36,
available at: <uri>http://iahs.info/redbooks/a209/iahs_209_0029.pdf</uri> (last access: 19 June 2019), 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Eyubova, F. A.: The investigation of long-term changes of hydrological
regime and of runoff of suspended loads of the rivers of north-eastern slope
of greater caucasus (within of Azerbaijan republic), Geogr. Bull., 2,
32–38, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gabrielyan, G. K.: The intensity of denudation in the caucasus, Geomorphol.
RAS, 1, 22–27, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hiemstra, P. H., Pebesma, E. J., Twenhöfel, C. J. W., and Heuvelink, G.
B. M.: Real-time automatic interpolation of ambient gamma dose rates from
the Dutch radioactivity monitoring network, Comput. Geosci., 35,
1711–1721, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.10.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cageo.2008.10.011</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hollister, J. and Tarak Shah: elevatr: Access Elevation Data from Various
APIs, available at: <uri>http://github.com/usepa/elevatr</uri> (last access: 19 June 2019), 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jaoshvili, S.: The rivers of the Black Sea, EEA Tech. Rep., 71,   58 pp., 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Khmeleva, N. V., Vinogradova, N. N., Samoilova, A. A., and Shevchenko, B. F.:
Mountain river basin and exogenous processes within it, edited by:
Chalov, R. S., LMSU Faculty of Geography, Moscow, 186 pp., 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lehner, B. and Grill, G.: Global river hydrography and network routing:
baseline data and new approaches to study the world's large river systems,
Hydrol. Process., 27, 2171–2186, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9740" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.9740</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Magritskii, D. V.: Variations in sediment runoff in the lower reaches and
the delta of the Kuban River in the XX–XXI centuries, Water Resour., 38,
709–719, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807811060108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1134/S0097807811060108</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Malamud, B. D., Turcotte, D. L., Guzzetti, F., and Reichenbach, P.:
Landslides, earthquakes, and erosion, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 229,
45–59, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.10.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2004.10.018</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Milliman, J. D. and Syvitski, J. P. M.: Geomorphic/Tectonic Control of
Sediment Discharge to the Ocean: The Importance of Small Mountainous Rivers,
J. Geol., 100, 525–544, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1086/629606" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1086/629606</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moatar, F., Person, G., Meybeck, M., Coynel, A., Etcheber, H., and Crouzet,
P.: The influence of contrasting suspended particulate matter transport
regimes on the bias and precision of flux estimates, Sci. Total Environ.,
370, 515–531, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.07.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.07.029</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Montgomery, D. R. and Brandon, M. T.: Topographic controls on erosion rates
in tectonically active mountain ranges, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 201,
481–489, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00725-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00725-2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mozzherin, V. V. and Sharifullin, A. G.: Estimation of current denudation
rate of the mountains based on the suspended sediment runoff of the rivers
(the Tien Shan, the Pamir-Alai, the Caucasus, and the Alps as an example),
Geomorphol. RAS,  1, 15–23, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.15356/0435-4281-2014-1-15-23" ext-link-type="DOI">10.15356/0435-4281-2014-1-15-23</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual
models part I – A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6</ext-link>, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schliep, K. and Hechenbichler, K.: kknn: Weighted k-Nearest Neighbors,
available at: <uri>https://cran.r-project.org/package=kknn</uri>  (last access: 19 June 2019), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Syvitski, J. P. M. and Milliman, J. D.: Geology, geography, and humans
battle for dominance over the delivery of fluvial sediment to the coastal
ocean, J. Geol., 115, 1–19, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tsyplenkov, A., Vanmaercke, M., and Golosov, V.: Caucasus-sediment-yield, available at: <uri>https://github.com/atsyplenkov/caucasus-sediment-yield</uri> (last access: 19 June 2019), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vanmaercke, M., Poesen, J., Verstraeten, G., de Vente, J., and Ocakoglu, F.:
Sediment yield in Europe: Spatial patterns and scale dependency,
Geomorphology, 130, 142–161, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.03.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.03.010</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page93?><ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vanmaercke, M., Poesen, J., Radoane, M., Govers, G., Ocakoglu, F., and Arabkhedri, M.: How long should we measure? An exploration of factors controlling the inter-annual variation of catchment sediment yield, J. Soils Sediment., 12, 603–619, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-012-0475-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11368-012-0475-3</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vanmaercke, M., Poesen, J., Govers, G., and Verstraeten, G.: Quantifying
human impacts on catchment sediment yield: A continental approach, Glob.
Planet. Change, 130, 22–36, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.04.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.04.001</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Contemporary suspended sediment yield of Caucasus mountains</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Processes linked to climate change and intensified
anthropogenic pressure influence the environment, the hydrology and by
extent the denudation processes in the Caucasus mountain belt. Quantitative
assessments of sediment fluxes and their temporal evolution in this mountain
region are required for various environmental and engineering purposes,
including the planning and maintenance of water reservoirs and other
structures. In this paper, we present a first analysis of the hitherto
largest suspended sediment yield (<i>SSY</i>) database for the Caucasus region,
comprising data from 198 catchments (&gt;&thinsp;4000 catchment-years of
observations). We present an overview of the existing contemporary <i>SSY</i> data
from gauging stations observations. Based on these data and different
models, we propose preliminary maps of the spatial patterns of <i>SSY</i> and
denudation rates in the Caucasus region.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abduev, M. A.: Amending the runoff suspended sediment and turbidity of the
mountain rivers of Azerbaijan under the influence of economic activity,
Geogr. Bull., 32, 29–37, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Ahnert, F.: Functional relationships between denudation, relief, and uplift
in large, mid-latitude drainage basins, Am. J. Sci., 268, 243–263,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.268.3.243" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.268.3.243</a>, 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Dedkov, A. P. and Moszherin, V. I.: Erosion and Sediment Runoff on the Earth, Kazan: Izd-vo Kazansk. un-ta., 264 pp., 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Dedkov, A. P. and Moszherin, V. I.: Erosion and sediment yield in mountain
regions of the world, Eros. Debris Flows Environ. Mt. Reg., 209, 29–36,
available at: <a href="http://iahs.info/redbooks/a209/iahs_209_0029.pdf" target="_blank">http://iahs.info/redbooks/a209/iahs_209_0029.pdf</a> (last access: 19 June 2019), 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Eyubova, F. A.: The investigation of long-term changes of hydrological
regime and of runoff of suspended loads of the rivers of north-eastern slope
of greater caucasus (within of Azerbaijan republic), Geogr. Bull., 2,
32–38, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Gabrielyan, G. K.: The intensity of denudation in the caucasus, Geomorphol.
RAS, 1, 22–27, 1971.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Hiemstra, P. H., Pebesma, E. J., Twenhöfel, C. J. W., and Heuvelink, G.
B. M.: Real-time automatic interpolation of ambient gamma dose rates from
the Dutch radioactivity monitoring network, Comput. Geosci., 35,
1711–1721, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.10.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.10.011</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Hollister, J. and Tarak Shah: elevatr: Access Elevation Data from Various
APIs, available at: <a href="http://github.com/usepa/elevatr" target="_blank">http://github.com/usepa/elevatr</a> (last access: 19 June 2019), 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Jaoshvili, S.: The rivers of the Black Sea, EEA Tech. Rep., 71,   58 pp., 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Khmeleva, N. V., Vinogradova, N. N., Samoilova, A. A., and Shevchenko, B. F.:
Mountain river basin and exogenous processes within it, edited by:
Chalov, R. S., LMSU Faculty of Geography, Moscow, 186 pp., 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Lehner, B. and Grill, G.: Global river hydrography and network routing:
baseline data and new approaches to study the world's large river systems,
Hydrol. Process., 27, 2171–2186, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9740" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9740</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Magritskii, D. V.: Variations in sediment runoff in the lower reaches and
the delta of the Kuban River in the XX–XXI centuries, Water Resour., 38,
709–719, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807811060108" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807811060108</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Malamud, B. D., Turcotte, D. L., Guzzetti, F., and Reichenbach, P.:
Landslides, earthquakes, and erosion, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 229,
45–59, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.10.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.10.018</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Milliman, J. D. and Syvitski, J. P. M.: Geomorphic/Tectonic Control of
Sediment Discharge to the Ocean: The Importance of Small Mountainous Rivers,
J. Geol., 100, 525–544, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1086/629606" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1086/629606</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Moatar, F., Person, G., Meybeck, M., Coynel, A., Etcheber, H., and Crouzet,
P.: The influence of contrasting suspended particulate matter transport
regimes on the bias and precision of flux estimates, Sci. Total Environ.,
370, 515–531, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.07.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.07.029</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Montgomery, D. R. and Brandon, M. T.: Topographic controls on erosion rates
in tectonically active mountain ranges, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 201,
481–489, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00725-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00725-2</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Mozzherin, V. V. and Sharifullin, A. G.: Estimation of current denudation
rate of the mountains based on the suspended sediment runoff of the rivers
(the Tien Shan, the Pamir-Alai, the Caucasus, and the Alps as an example),
Geomorphol. RAS,  1, 15–23, <a href="https://doi.org/10.15356/0435-4281-2014-1-15-23" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.15356/0435-4281-2014-1-15-23</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual
models part I – A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6</a>, 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Schliep, K. and Hechenbichler, K.: kknn: Weighted k-Nearest Neighbors,
available at: <a href="https://cran.r-project.org/package=kknn" target="_blank">https://cran.r-project.org/package=kknn</a>  (last access: 19 June 2019), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Syvitski, J. P. M. and Milliman, J. D.: Geology, geography, and humans
battle for dominance over the delivery of fluvial sediment to the coastal
ocean, J. Geol., 115, 1–19, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Tsyplenkov, A., Vanmaercke, M., and Golosov, V.: Caucasus-sediment-yield, available at: <a href="https://github.com/atsyplenkov/caucasus-sediment-yield" target="_blank">https://github.com/atsyplenkov/caucasus-sediment-yield</a> (last access: 19 June 2019), 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Vanmaercke, M., Poesen, J., Verstraeten, G., de Vente, J., and Ocakoglu, F.:
Sediment yield in Europe: Spatial patterns and scale dependency,
Geomorphology, 130, 142–161, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.03.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.03.010</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Vanmaercke, M., Poesen, J., Radoane, M., Govers, G., Ocakoglu, F., and Arabkhedri, M.: How long should we measure? An exploration of factors controlling the inter-annual variation of catchment sediment yield, J. Soils Sediment., 12, 603–619, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-012-0475-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-012-0475-3</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Vanmaercke, M., Poesen, J., Govers, G., and Verstraeten, G.: Quantifying
human impacts on catchment sediment yield: A continental approach, Glob.
Planet. Change, 130, 22–36, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.04.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.04.001</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
