<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \bartext{Understanding spatio-temporal variability of water resources in
eastern and southern Africa}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">PIAHS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">PIAHS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Proc. IAHS</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2199-899X</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/piahs-378-79-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Water use dynamics of young and mature apple trees planted in South African orchards: a case study of the Golden Delicious and Cripps' Pink cultivars</article-title><alt-title>Water use dynamics of young and mature apple trees planted in South African orchards</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Water use dynamics of young and mature apple trees planted in South African orchards}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Z.~Ntshidi et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Ntshidi</surname><given-names>Zanele</given-names></name>
          <email>zntshidi@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Dzikiti</surname><given-names>Sebinasi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Mazvimavi</surname><given-names>Dominic</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Earth Sciences, University of the Western Cape,
Bellville 7535, South Africa</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Council for Scientific and Industrial
Research, Natural Resources and Environment, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Stellenbosch 7600,
South Africa</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Zanele Ntshidi (zntshidi@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>29</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>378</volume>
      <fpage>79</fpage><lpage>83</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>10</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>December</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/378/79/2018/piahs-378-79-2018.html">This article is available from https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/378/79/2018/piahs-378-79-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/378/79/2018/piahs-378-79-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/378/79/2018/piahs-378-79-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e99">Apple orchards have previously been bearing 60–80 t ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at most.
However in recent years yield has increased to more than 100 t ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
There is need to understand the water requirements of the high yielding
orchards, given that high crop loads are associated with high water use
rates. The aim of this study was to quantify the water requirements of young
and mature unstressed apple orchards. We also assess the impact of climate
variables on transpiration rates. Data was collected in 4 orchards in the
Western Cape Province. The orchards comprised young non-bearing
(&lt; 3 years) and mature trees planted to the Golden Delicious and
Cripps' Pink cultivars, all under micro-sprinkler irrigation. Transpiration
by the trees was measured using heat pulse velocity sap flow sensors hourly
throughout the growing season (October–June). Weather was monitored using an
automatic weather station. Tree transpiration was linearly related to the
solar radiation, but the relationship with the vapour pressure deficit (VPD)
was non-linear. There were no significant differences (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
in the sapflux density of the Golden Delicious and Cripp's Pink cultivars.
This suggests that these two cultivars have similar water use
characteristics. Mature orchards transpired between 6000 to
8000 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> season<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> while non-bearing orchards used
between 2000 to 3000 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> season<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e212">South Africa is currently the 7th biggest exporter of apples (<italic>Malus domestica</italic> Borkh.) in the world. The main Southern hemisphere competitor is
Chile, which is ranked third in terms of export. In South Africa, most apples
are grown in the Eastern and Western Cape Provinces. The Western Cape
experiences Mediterranean climatic conditions and most of the rain falls
outside the fruit growing season in winter. This region is projected to
experience severe water shortages in future due to the rapidly increasing
population, increasing agricultural and industrial activities and climate
change (Midgley and Lötze, 2011). Accurate information on water use by
apple orchards is therefore critical for the sustainability of the
multi-billion Rand deciduous fruit industry. This information will be useful
for, among other things: (1) developing irrigation scheduling guidelines for
the apple industry, (2) water allocation and planning, and; (3) developing
strategies for coping with drought whose frequency and severity is expected
to increase in the near future in the South Western parts of the country.
Severe water deficits imposed by a lack of irrigation not only reduce the
current year's yields, but they also negatively affect production in
subsequent years, enhance alternate bearing and damage or kill trees (Fereres
et al., 2012). An important information gap currently exists regarding the
water requirements of high yielding (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 t ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) apple
orchards which have become the norm in this region in recent years. There is
also no published information on how water use varies with orchard growth
stages from planting until full-bearing. Although several studies have
quantified water use by apple orchards (Braun et al., 2000; Volschenk et al.,
2003; Dragoni et al., 2005; Gush and Taylor, 2014) these studies were not
done in exceptionally high yielding orchards. The specific objective of the
study was to<?pagebreak page80?> quantify how transpiration of apple orchards change with canopy
cover, to facilitate the development of irrigation guidelines. An example of
a programme in which the fruit industry could directly benefit from the data
generated in this study is the recently launched Validation and Verification
of Lawful Water Use (V&amp;V) programme. This programme has been rolled out
throughout South Africa by the Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS)
mainly to confirm how much water may be used lawfully for commercial purposes
(including irrigation) to facilitate water use licensing in line with the
country's Water Act of 1998. Therefore, this study sets a benchmark on the
water requirements of the country's most productive apple orchards.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study sites</title>
      <p id="d1e248">Four orchards (two non-bearing and two full-bearing) were monitored in the
Koue Bokkeveld (KBV) region during the 2014/15 growing season. Yield in all
full-bearing orchards was consistently above 100 t ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The full-bearing
“Cripps' Pink” and “Golden Delicious” orchards were in adjacent blocks KP06
and KP07 at Kromfontein Farm in the Koue Bokkeveld (S32.97120<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
E019.23295<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; 876 m a.s.l.). They were both ca. 6 ha in size and aged
22 years for the “Golden Delicious” and 9 years for the “Cripps' Pink”. They
had similar soil types namely the deep sandy Fernwood soils with
approximately 30 % stone. Tree spacing in both orchards was 4 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 m
giving a plant density of 1667 trees per hectare. Rootstock in both
orchards was the industry standard M793. Both orchards were irrigated with
medium range micro sprinkler systems.</p>
      <p id="d1e288">The non-bearing “Golden Delicious” orchard was at Lindeshof Farm
(S32.95002<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; E019.20737<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; 820 m a.s.l.), less than 2 km
from Kromfontein. Both farms belong to Dutoit Agri and therefore they had
similar management practices. The non-bearing “Golden Delicious” orchard was
two years old and it was about 3.17 ha in size. The rootstock was also the
M793 and the trees were planted in rows with a north-south orientation. Tree
spacing and soil types were similar to that of the full bearing orchards.
The non-bearing “Cripps' Pink” orchard was at Paardekloof farm
(S32<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>39.02<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; E019<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>16<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>00.74<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; 900 m a.s.l.) on MM109
rootstock. The Paardekloof orchard was about 6.3 ha, but trees were planted
at 3.5 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.25 m giving a substantially higher plant density of 2285 trees
per hectare. The trees were three years old and also growing on deep sandy
soils irrigated with a medium range sprinkler system.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Climate data</title>
      <p id="d1e383">Weather data was measured using an automatic weather station in close
proximity to the orchards. The station was installed at a site with uniform
short grass cover whose attributes were close of those of the grass
reference surface (Allen et al., 1998). The equipment comprised a
pyranometer (Model: SP 212 Apogee Instruments, Inc., Logan UT, USA), which
measured the solar irradiance and it was installed on a north facing
horizontal levelling fixture to avoid self-shading and to minimize cosine
errors. Air temperature and relative humidity were measured using a
temperature and humidity probe (Model: HMP60 Campbell Scientific, Inc.,
Logan UT, USA) installed at a height of about 2.0 m above the ground.
Rainfall was recorded using a tipping bucket rain gauge (Model: TE525-L;
Campbell Scientific, Inc., Logan UT, USA). All the sensors were connected to
a data logger (Model: CR1000 Campbell Scientific, Inc., Logan UT, USA)
programmed with a scan interval of 10 s and the output signals were
processed at hourly and daily intervals, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Tree water use</title>
      <p id="d1e392">Transpiration in each of the full-bearing orchards was measured from
September 2014 until June 2015 on six trees of different stem sizes using
the heat ratio method of the heat pulse velocity (HPV) sap flow technique
(Burgess et al., 2001). Four sets of heater probes and T-type thermocouple
pairs were inserted into the sap wood of the stems at depths ranging from 10
to 50 mm under the bark, depending on the size of the stem, to account for
the circumferential and radial variation in sap velocity (Wullschleger and
King, 2000). The HPV data was corrected for wounding, moisture fraction and
wood density at the end of the experiment according to the approach by
Swanson and Whitfield (1981). The wound widths were measured at five
positions across the length of the wound created by sensor implantation
using Vernier callipers. The conducting sapwood area was determined by
injecting a weak solution of methylene blue dye into the stems towards the
end of the experiment to determine the extent of the active xylem vessels.
The bark-sapwood-heartwood boundaries were clearly distinguishable with this
method. Transpiration by the smaller trees in the non-bearing orchards was
measured using Granier probes (Model: TDP 10, Dynamax Inc., Houston, USA)
(Granier, 1987). Three trees were instrumented per orchard and the average
sap velocity was determined in the depth range 0 to 10 mm of the stems. The
sensors were installed at a height between 50 and 75 cm from the ground to
eliminate errors due to cold sap especially early in the morning. Installing
the sensors at the recommended 1.0 m height above the ground was not
feasible because the trees branched close to the ground. A double layer of
aluminium bubble wrap was wrapped around the sensors to minimize the effects
of exogenous heating on the sap temperature signals. The TDP sensors were
calibrated against the more accurate stem heat balance sap flow sensors
given the tendency of TDPs to underestimate transpiration rates (Steppe et
al., 2010). Both the TDP and HPV sap flow<?pagebreak page81?> data was collected at hourly
intervals throughout the study period (i.e. September 2014 to June 2015 in
KBV).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e401">Differences in the sapflux density (sapflow per unit sapwood area) were
compared between the two cultivars using one way analysis of variance
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test) with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e425"><bold>(a)</bold> Solar radiation, <bold>(b)</bold> minimum and maximum
temperature and <bold>(c)</bold> Vapour Pressure Deficit from September 2014 to
May 2015.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/378/79/2018/piahs-378-79-2018-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e444">Water use of the young and mature apple trees and the reference
evapotranspiration.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/378/79/2018/piahs-378-79-2018-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e456">Transpiration response of full-bearing <bold>(a)</bold> “Cripps' Pink”
to solar radiation, <bold>(b)</bold> “Golden Delicious” to solar radiation,
<bold>(c)</bold> “Cripps' Pink” to VPD <bold>(d)</bold> “Golden Delicious” to
VPD.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/378/79/2018/piahs-378-79-2018-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e484">The maximum daily solar radiation was 30.02 MJ m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> recorded on 17
December 2014 and the lowest was 6.9 MJ m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> measured on 2 November
2014. December 2014 had the highest average daily solar radiation of approx.
28.3 MJ m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The maximum and minimum air temperatures were 37.3 and 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
reached in December 2014 and June 2015, respectively. The
maximum air temperature exceeded 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in seven of the nine
months. The relative humidity ranged from 99.9 % to as low as 5.4 % on
hot dry days with the vapour pressure deficit of the air peaking at 3.1 kPa
(Fig. 1). The reference evapotranspiration (ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is a measure of
the atmospheric evaporative demand, was calculated as the evapotranspiration
from a short grass reference using the modified Penman-Monteith equation
according to Allen et al. (1998). The seasonal total reference
evapotranspiration was 1205.4 mm. Transpiration for the full bearing “Golden
Delicious” trees peaked at 5 mm d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the similar size trees of the
Cripps' Pink cultivar peaked at 3.5 mm d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the end of January 2015. The
non-bearing “Golden Delicious” and Cripps' Pink trees transpiration peaked
at 1.7 and 2.02 mm d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2) on 25 January 2015 and 6 December 2014,
respectively. The seasonal total for the full-bearing “Golden Delicious” was
770 mm while for “Cripps' Pink” it was 587 mm. The non-bearing “Golden
Delicious” trees transpired a seasonal total of 187 mm while “Cripps'
Pink” transpired 238 mm for the season. Variations in transpiration rates in
full-bearing orchards were a result of differences in canopy management
practices between the “Golden Delicious” and “Cripps' Pink” orchards.
“Cripps' Pink” canopies are kept open e.g. by pruning and spraying shoot
growth retardants such as Regalis<sup>®</sup> to expose the fruit to
solar radiation for anthocyanin synthesis to occur and to promote the
development of the red fruit colour. The leaf area index (LAI) for the full
bearing “Golden Delicious” was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> while for the “Cripps'
Pink” it was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For non-bearing orchards it was 0.8 for
“Golden Delicious” and 1.0 for “Cripps' Pink”. Canopy cover seems to be the
main driver of water use, the bigger the canopy, the more water the tree
uses. The daily total transpiration was linearly related to the daily solar
radiation (Fig. 3a and b). However, the relationship between transpiration
and VPD (Fig. 3c and d) was<?pagebreak page82?> non-linear, suggesting that the VPD is the most
limiting variable for apple trees transpiration.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e644">This study provides first estimates of the water use characteristics of
apple trees considering newly planted and mature trees. For mature trees, it
appears that “Cripps' Pink” trees tend to use less water than “Golden
Delicious”. This is because they tend to have more open canopies due to
management practices e.g. the spraying of chemicals such as Regalis<sup>®</sup>
to reduce shoot growth. Dense foliage is not favourable for
the development of the red colour on fruit in red and blushed cultivars and
these canopy management practices appear to have water saving benefits. In
non-bearing trees, the Cripps' Pink cultivar seems to be using more water
than the “Golden Delicious”. Transpiration was linearly related to the solar
radiation, while VPD seemed to be a limiting variable for water use.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e655">The Water Research Commission (WRC) has all the rights to
the data as they are the funders. Their policy supports that data be made
public. However, this project is still ongoing, therefore no data is made
available yet. When the project has been finalized, the data will be
available at <uri>www.wrc.org.za</uri>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e664">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p id="d1e670">This article is part of the special issue “Understanding
spatio-temporal variability of water resources and the implications for IWRM
in semi-arid eastern and southern Africa”. It is a result of the IAHS
Scientific Assembly 2017, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 10–14 July 2017.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e676">This project was initiated, supported and managed by the Water Research
Commission (project no WRC K5 2398/4) and the South African Apple and Pear
Producers' Association (SAAPPA). We are sincerely grateful for the financial
support from these entities. Additional South African Parliamentary Grant
funding through the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (project
number ECHS 043) and CSIR Young Researcher Establishment Fund (project ECHS
074) are also greatly acknowledged.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by:
Webster Gumindoga<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: Timothy Dube and one anonymous
referee</p></ack><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop
evapotranspiration, FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56, Food and
Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Braun, P., Maurer, B., and Heinemann, G.: Scaling transpiration in apple
orchards-meteorological versus plant based physiological measurements, Acta
Hort., 537, 45–51, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Burgess, S. S. O., Adams, M. A., Turner, N. C., Beverly, C. R., Ong, C. K.,
Khan, A. A. H., and Bleby, T. M.: An improved heat pulse method to measure
low and reverse rates of sap flow in woody plants, Tree Physiol., 21,
589–598, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Dragoni, D., Lakso, A. N., and Piccioni, R. M.: Transpiration of apple trees
in a humid climate using heat pulse sap flow gauges calibrated with
whole-canopy gas exchange chambers, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 130, 85–94, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Fereres, E., Goldhamer, D. A., and Sadras, V. O.: Yield responses to water of
fruit trees and vines, UN Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome Italy,
246–497, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Granier, A. R.: Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas fir stand by means
of sap flow measurements, Tree Physiol., 3, 309–320, 1987.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Gush, M. B. and Taylor, N. J.: The water use of selected fruit tree orchards
(Volume 2): technical report on measurements and modelling, Water Research
Commission report no. 1770/2/14, WRC, Pretoria, South Africa, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Midgley, S. J. E. and Lötze, E.: Climate change in the western cape of
South Africa: trends, projections and implications for chill unit
accumulation, Acta Hort., 903, 1127–1133, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Steppe, K., De Pauw, D. J. W., Doody, T. M., and Teskey, R. O.: A comparison
of sap flux density using thermal dissipation, heat pulse velocity and heat
field deformation methods, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 150, 1046–1056, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Swanson, R. H. and Whitfield, D. W. A.: A numerical analysis of heat pulse
velocity theory and practice, J. Exp. Bot., 32, 221–239, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Volschenk T., De Villiers, J. F., and Beukes, O.: The selection and
calibration of a model for irrigation scheduling of deciduous fruit orchards,
WRC report 89, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Wullschleger, S. D. and King, W. K.: Radial variation in sap velocity as a
function of stem diameter and sapwood thickness in yellow-poplar trees, Tree
Physiol., 20, 511–518, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Water use dynamics of young and mature apple trees planted in South African orchards: a case study of the Golden Delicious and Cripps' Pink cultivars</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Apple orchards have previously been bearing 60–80 t ha<sup>−1</sup> at most.
However in recent years yield has increased to more than 100 t ha<sup>−1</sup>.
There is need to understand the water requirements of the high yielding
orchards, given that high crop loads are associated with high water use
rates. The aim of this study was to quantify the water requirements of young
and mature unstressed apple orchards. We also assess the impact of climate
variables on transpiration rates. Data was collected in 4 orchards in the
Western Cape Province. The orchards comprised young non-bearing
(&lt; 3 years) and mature trees planted to the Golden Delicious and
Cripps' Pink cultivars, all under micro-sprinkler irrigation. Transpiration
by the trees was measured using heat pulse velocity sap flow sensors hourly
throughout the growing season (October–June). Weather was monitored using an
automatic weather station. Tree transpiration was linearly related to the
solar radiation, but the relationship with the vapour pressure deficit (VPD)
was non-linear. There were no significant differences (<i>p</i><i>&gt;</i>0.05)
in the sapflux density of the Golden Delicious and Cripp's Pink cultivars.
This suggests that these two cultivars have similar water use
characteristics. Mature orchards transpired between 6000 to
8000 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>−1</sup> season<sup>−1</sup> while non-bearing orchards used
between 2000 to 3000 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>−1</sup> season<sup>−1</sup>.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop
evapotranspiration, FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56, Food and
Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Braun, P., Maurer, B., and Heinemann, G.: Scaling transpiration in apple
orchards-meteorological versus plant based physiological measurements, Acta
Hort., 537, 45–51, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Burgess, S. S. O., Adams, M. A., Turner, N. C., Beverly, C. R., Ong, C. K.,
Khan, A. A. H., and Bleby, T. M.: An improved heat pulse method to measure
low and reverse rates of sap flow in woody plants, Tree Physiol., 21,
589–598, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Dragoni, D., Lakso, A. N., and Piccioni, R. M.: Transpiration of apple trees
in a humid climate using heat pulse sap flow gauges calibrated with
whole-canopy gas exchange chambers, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 130, 85–94, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Fereres, E., Goldhamer, D. A., and Sadras, V. O.: Yield responses to water of
fruit trees and vines, UN Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome Italy,
246–497, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Granier, A. R.: Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas fir stand by means
of sap flow measurements, Tree Physiol., 3, 309–320, 1987.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Gush, M. B. and Taylor, N. J.: The water use of selected fruit tree orchards
(Volume 2): technical report on measurements and modelling, Water Research
Commission report no. 1770/2/14, WRC, Pretoria, South Africa, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Midgley, S. J. E. and Lötze, E.: Climate change in the western cape of
South Africa: trends, projections and implications for chill unit
accumulation, Acta Hort., 903, 1127–1133, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Steppe, K., De Pauw, D. J. W., Doody, T. M., and Teskey, R. O.: A comparison
of sap flux density using thermal dissipation, heat pulse velocity and heat
field deformation methods, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 150, 1046–1056, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Swanson, R. H. and Whitfield, D. W. A.: A numerical analysis of heat pulse
velocity theory and practice, J. Exp. Bot., 32, 221–239, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Volschenk T., De Villiers, J. F., and Beukes, O.: The selection and
calibration of a model for irrigation scheduling of deciduous fruit orchards,
WRC report 89, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Wullschleger, S. D. and King, W. K.: Radial variation in sap velocity as a
function of stem diameter and sapwood thickness in yellow-poplar trees, Tree
Physiol., 20, 511–518, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
