PIAHSProceedings of the International Association of Hydrological SciencesPIAHSProc. IAHS2199-899XCopernicus PublicationsGöttingen, Germany10.5194/piahs-377-57-2018Sedimentation and Its Impacts/Effects on River System and Reservoir Water
Quality: case Study of Mazowe Catchment, ZimbabweSedimentation and Its Impacts/Effects on River System and Reservoir Water
QualityTunduColletactundu@gmail.comTumbareMichael JamesKileshye OnemaJean-MarieZimbabwe National Water Authority, P.O. Box Cy617 Causeway, Harare, ZimbabweDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Zimbabwe, P.O. Box MP167, Mt Pleasant, Harare, ZimbabweWaterNet Secretariat, P.O. Box MP600, Mount Pleasant, Harare, ZimbabweColleta Tundu (ctundu@gmail.com)16April201837757667June201710October2017This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is available from https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/377/57/2018/piahs-377-57-2018.htmlThe full text article is available as a PDF file from https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/377/57/2018/piahs-377-57-2018.pdf
Sediment delivery into water sources and bodies results in the reduction of
water quantity and quality, increasing costs of water purification whilst
reducing the available water for various other uses. The paper gives an
analysis of sedimentation in one of Zimbabwe's seven rivers, the Mazowe
Catchment, and its impact on water quality. The Revised Universal Soil Loss
Equation (RUSLE) model was used to compute soil lost from the catchment as a
result of soil erosion. The model was used in conjunction with GIS remotely
sensed data and limited ground observations. The estimated annual soil loss
in the catchment indicates soil loss ranging from 0 to 65 t ha yr-1. Bathymetric survey at Chimhanda Dam showed that the capacity of
the dam had reduced by 39 % as a result of sedimentation and the annual
sediment deposition into Chimhanda Dam was estimated to be 330 t with a
specific yield of 226 t km-2 yr-1. Relationship between selected water
quality parameters, TSS, DO, NO3, pH, TDS, turbidity and sediment yield
for selected water sampling points and Chimhanda Dam was analyzed. It was
established that there is a strong positive relationship between the sediment
yield and the water quality parameters. Sediment yield showed high positive
correlation with turbidity (0.63) and TDS (0.64). Water quality data from
Chimhanda treatment plant water works revealed that the quality of water is
deteriorating as a result of increase in sediment accumulation in the dam.
The study concluded that sedimentation can affect the water quality of water
sources.
Introduction
Sedimentation is a process whereby soil particles are eroded and transported
by flowing water or other transporting media and deposited as layers of
solid particles in water bodies such as reservoirs and rivers. It is a
complex process that varies with watershed sediment yield, rate of
transportation and mode of deposition (Ezugwu, 2013). Sediment deposition
reduces the storage capacity and life span of reservoirs as well as river
flows (Eroglu et al., 2010).
Sedimentation continues to be one of the most important threats to river
eco-systems around the world. A study was done on the world's 145 major
rivers with consistency long term sediment records and the results show that
about 50 % of the rivers have statistically a significantly downward flow
trend due to sedimentation (Walling and Fang, 2003). Sumi and Hirose (2009) reported that the
global reservoir gross storage capacity is
about 6000 km3 and annual reservoir sedimentation rates are about 31 km3 (0.52 %). This suggests that at this sedimentation rate, the
global reservoir storage capacity will be reduced to 50 % by year 2100.
Studies on some dams in Zimbabwe show that reservoir capacities are being
affected by sedimentation (Sawunyama et al., 2006; Dalu et al., 2013; Chitata et al., 2014).
Water is vital for all anthropogenic activities. Water bodies have been
contaminated with various pollutants due to direct or indirect interference
of men causing an adverse impact on human health and aquatic life (Lawson,
2011). The quality of water is getting vastly deteriorated due to improper
land management and carelessness to the environment. Off late sediment
transport in the water bodies has proved to be one of the major contributors
to poor water quality. Due to land degradation and sheet erosion, the top
soil is carried into the water bodies resulting in excess levels of
turbidity. Silt and clay particles are primary carriers of adsorbed
chemicals such as nitrogen and phosphorus.
This study uses the Mazowe Catchment area as a case study in analyzing river
and reservoir sedimentation and its impact on water quality. Sedimentation
in the rivers and reservoirs within the Mazowe Catchment area has become a
major challenge for the policy makers as well as the water managers.
Study area
Mazowe Catchment is one of the seven water management catchments in
Zimbabwe. It lies between 16.470∘ S (latitude) and
18.240∘ S (latitude) and between 30.680∘ E
(longitude) and 33.000∘ E (longitude). The catchment has a
total area of 38 005 km2 and is in the northern part of the country.
There are 30 major dams built along the main river and some of the
tributaries. There are 13 functional gauging stations within the catchment.
The catchment is composed of twenty-four (24) hydrological sub-zones.
Rainfall for the Catchment averages 500 mm to 1200 mm yr-1 while the mean
annual runoff is 131 mm with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 126 %
(Zinwa, 2009). There are 17 water quality monitoring sampling points
within the catchment. Six (6) sampling water points were selected for the
study, these points were selected basing on the continuity of the available
data meaning to say the points had less missing gaps.
Chimhanda Dam, in Lower Mazowe Sub-Catchment, was chosen for the assessment
of the levels of sedimentation in resevoirs. Chimhanda Dam is located on the
confluence of Runwa and Mwera Rivers, which are tributaries of Mazowe River.
The dam is located in hydrological sub zone, DM1 with latitude 16∘40′, and longitude 32∘06′. The dam was completed in 1988 with a
design capacity of 5.2 × 106 m3 and covering a catchment area of
68.7 km2, which mainly consists of communal lands.
Mazowe Catchment and location of Chimhanda Dam.
Materials and methodsData collection
Remote sensing images of the study area were downloaded from Landsat TM 4-5,
LandSat LE7 and LandSat 8 scene from the website (https://glovis.usgs.gov/) for paths 168–170 and rows 71–73 for the
period, 2000, 2005, 2008 and 2014. The study period was selected basing on
the major changes in land use and land cover as a result of the Zimbabwe
land reform programme which started in year 2000 and peaking during year
2003. The composite map was obtained by gluing and merging the tiles from
the different scenes which was performed using Integrated Land and Water
Information System (ILWIS) software. Normalized Differences Vegetation Index
(NDVI) was extracted from the images and this was used to calculate the
cover and management practice factor (C factor). SRTM DEM of 90m resolution
was obtained from Earth Explorer website (http://EarthExplorer.com). The DEM was used to calculate the
slope length and slope steepness factor (LS factor). The erodibility factor
was obtained from the soil map of Zimbabwe that was downloaded from website
(www.fao.org/geonetwork. Rainfall data was obtained from
the Zimbabwe Meteorological Services Department and was used to come up with
the erosivity factor. The grab sample method was used to obtain samples for
sediment loads from the flow gauges for the 2014/2015 rainfall season.
Historical data for sediment loads from flow gauging stations were obtained
from the Zimbabwe National Water Authority (ZINWA). Historical water quality
data for selected water quality monitoring stations was obtained from
Environmental Management Agency (EMA).
Siltation historical data for selected reservoirs within the catchment was
obtained from ZINWA. A bathymetric survey was done to assess the level of
sedimentation of Chimhanda dam which lies within the Mazowe Catchment.
Calculation of RUSLE Factors
The Revised Universal Soil Erosion (RUSLE) model was used in this study to
calculate the soil that was lost from the catchment. The model predicted the
long term annual loss from the basin and is given by Eq. (1; Renard et al., 1997):
A=R×K×LS×C×P
where: A= annual soil loss (t ha yr-1);
R= rain erosivity factor (MJ mm ha-1 h-1);
K= soil erodibility factor (t ha h MJ-1 mm-1);
LS = slope length and slope steepness length (m);
C= land cover and crop management;
P= management practice.
Rain Erosivity Factor (R factor)
Rainfall data was processed into average annual rainfall. Rain erosivity was
calculated from the rainfall point map using Eq. (2; Merritt et al., 2003):
R=38.5+0.35×P
where:
R= Rain Erosivity Factor (Joule m-2).
P= Mean Annual Rainfall (mm yr-1).
Soil Erodibility Factor (K factor)
The soil erodibility factor (K Factor) was calculated using Eq. (3) with the
parameters obtained from the soil map (Teh, 2011).
K=(1.0×10-4(12-OM1.14+4.5F-3+3.0P-2)100
where K= Soil Erodibility; M= (% fine sand +%fine sand)] × (100-%clay)
O= % of organic matter;
F= Soil Structure;
P= Permeability.
Land Cover and Crop Management Factor (C factor)
The C factor was calculated using the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
(NDVI), which is a tool for assessing changes in vegetation cover
(Pettorelli et al., 2005; Gusso et al., 2014). NDVI was calculated from the
bands using Eq. (4; Deering, 1992).
NDVI=(NIR-Red)(NIR+Red)
where NIR = band 3 for landSat images 1 to 7 and band 4 for landSat 8.
Red = band 4 for landSat 1 to 7 and band 5 for landSat 8.
The calculated NDVI was then used to calculate the C factor from Eq. (5)
Cfactormap=12708×NDVI+02585
Management Practice Factor (P Factor)
The P factor reflects the control of conservation methods on soil loss. P
values range from 0.01 to 1, with the value 0.01 being given to areas of
maximum conservation support and the value 1 being given to areas with
minimal or no conservation practices (Renard et al., 1997). The P values
were derived from the land use map of the study area. Different values were
assigned to each type of land use as guided by literature and the P factor
map was produced (Jang et al., 1996).
Quantifying the sediment yield in the Catchment
The estimated soil loss was calculated from Eq. (6).
A=R×K×LS×C×P
where A= Average Soil Loss (t ha yr-1);
R=R factor map;
K=K factor map;
LS = LS factor map;
C=C factor map;
P=P factor.
Soil loss from the catchment cannot be taken as sediment contribution to a
river flow system since it does not account for deposition that occurs along
the path (de Vente et al., 2011). Therefore the estimated soil loss was
multiplied by the sediment delivery ratio (SDR) to obtain the sediment yield
of the catchment. Sediment delivery ratios represent the fraction of the
total soil loss that is washed into rivers and was calculated from using Eq. (7; USDA, 1972).
SDR=05656CA-0.11
where SDR = Sediment Delivery Ratio;
CA = Watershed Area, km2.
After determination of the sediment delivery ratio, the average sediment
yield was determined using Eq. (8), by Wischmeier and Smith (1978)
SR=SDR×A
where: SR = Sediment yield (t ha yr-1);
SDR = Sediment delivery ratio;
A= Average soil loss (t ha yr-1).
Sediment yield from field measurements
Seven out of the thirteen functional ZINWA gauging stations were selected
for collection of sediment concentration samples, (Fig. 2). Water samples
were collected from various flow gauging stations for the period November
2014 to March 2015 using grab sampling method. An average of 20 samples was
collected from each gauging station. The samples were analyzed in a
laboratory using the weighing and filtration method inorder to determine the
sediment concentration in mg L-1. The sediment load was determined by
multiplying the sediment load at a particular gauge by the area of
influence.
Gauges in the catchment and areas of influence.
Assessing the current sedimentation levels of Chimhanda Dam
A bathymetric survey was carried out at Chimhanda dam to determine the
siltation level of the dam. The survey was conducted using a SonTek River
Surveyor system and a theodolite to come up with a basin survey map. The
plotted map was digitized to get the surface area between contours. The area
was then multiplied by the contour interval to get the volume of each
contour using Simpson's formula.
Vcontour=A1+(A1×A2)1/2+A23
where Vcontour= contour Volume (m3);
A1= Area1 (m2);
A2= Area2 (m2).
The calculated volumes for each contour were accumulated to get the new
capacity of the dam.
Water quality trend from sedimentation
Water quality historical data from six selected water sampling points were
obtained from the Environmental Management Agency records. The points were
selected basing on the consistency of the data and less gaps. The trend for
the selected water quality parameters, TSS, DO, NO3, pH, TDS and
turbidity for the corresponding predicted sediment yield years were
analysed. The water quality parameters were compared with the Environmental
Management Agency, Effluent and Solid Waste Disposal Regulations Statutory
Instrument number 6 of 2007 (EMA, 2007) shown on Table 1. Water quality data
for Chimhanda water supply treatment plant from the Zimbabwe National Water
Authority was also related to the change in level of sedimentation of
Chimhanda Dam.
Selected water quality parameters were correlated with the corresponding
sediment yield to determine the relationship between sediment yield and
water quality. Pearson Correlation was used to estimate the strength of
relationship between sediment yield and some physical water quality.
Results and discussionsResults of the RUSLE factors
The erosivity map (R factor) depicts rainfall energy in the various areas
within the catchment. The rainfall erosivity ranges between 200 and 500
(MJ mm ha-1 h-1 yr). A greater part of the catchment is averaging
a rainfall erosivity value of 276 MJ mm ha-1 h-1 yr. Highest
rainfall erosivity values are in the Kairezi sub-catchment of the study
area. Erodability (K factor) values range from 0 to 0.5 t ha-1yr-1 MJ-1 mm-1. Some parts in the south west of the catchment
have high values of erodibility, the highest K value is dominated by very
fine sand with silt particles which give rise to higher soil erodibility
(Kamaludin et al., 2013). Highest slope length steepness (LS) values of 16 m
were found in the eastern part of the catchment. The northern part of the
catchment experiences average LS values of 7 m.
Cover Management and Practice (C factor) ranges from -1 to 1. The C factor
is depicted by NDVI which is a function of photosynthesis. The C factor is
high in the eastern highlands area, some parts of Kairezi sub-catchment and
along the Mufurudzi area. This is possible because the Kairezi area
experiences high rainfall while Mufurudzi being a game park, has more
vegetation. High C values were observed with high vegetation cover
(Pettorelli et al., 2005). The P value of 1 was observed in Lower Mazowe and
Upper Rwenya subcatchment areas respectively. Areas like Mufurudzi and parts
of Kairezi experienced an average P value of 0.8.
Soil loss from the catchment
The average annual soil loss for the different years are shown on Fig. 3
and the temporal variation of actual soil loss is tabulated on Table 2.
Estimated Average Soil Loss for 2000, 2005 2008, and 2014.
The estimated soil loss from the catchment ranges from 0 to
203 t ha yr-1. The estimated average soil loss is 54 t ha yr-1. The
highest soil loss is being experienced in Middle Mazowe and Nyagui
sub-catchments. High soil loss in Middle Mazowe sub-catchment can be
associated with high gold panning activities in the Mazowe valley whilst in
Nyagui sub-catchment, this can be associated with high crop farming
activities in the area. When the soil is made loose, its structure is
altered hence increase in erodibility.
The average soil loss value of 54 t ha yr-1 concurred with other studies
that were carried out in the country. Whitlow (1986) found that 76 t of
soil is lost per hectare per year through soil erosion in most parts of the
country. Another study by Mutowo and Chikodzi (2013) “Erosion hazards
mapping in the Runde Catchment”, concluded that most of the areas in the
catchment fall in the category range of 0–50 t ha yr-1. Makwara and Gamira (2012) reported that the most serious type of erosion being sheet
erosion, is estimated to remove an average 50 t ha yr-1 from Zimbabwe's
communal lands.
Temporal Variation of Estimated Soil Loss.
YearAverage SoilLoss (t ha yr-1)200054200565200836201462
There is no uniform trend in the soil loss over the study period. In year
2000, the soil loss was 54t ha yr-1. The increase of soil loss in 2005
from the 2000 figure can be explained by the land reform programme which
started in year 2000 and was at its peak around 2003. There was a lot of
deforestation as new farmers were clearing land for agricultural purposes
(Mambo and Archer, 2007). Some areas which were meant for animal rearing
and forest were also converted to crop agricultural areas. In 2008 the soil
loss rate decreased to 36 t ha yr-1. The reduction can be attributed to a
number of factors. Year 2008 experienced low erosivity as a result of low
rainfall, which could also lead to low annual soil loss. The economy of
Zimbabwe was almost at a stand-still during the period 2007 to 2009, with an
inflation rate record of over 231 million percent in July 2008 (Hanke
and Kwok, 2009). As a result there was less farming activities during that
period.
Measured sediment Load from flow gauges for the period December
2014 to March 2015.
Silt GaugeName or RiverArea ofSedimentLoadInfluence (km2)load (t km-2)(t)D75Mazowe20 3801.428536D50Nyamasanga130.243D42Mupfurudzi1631.92313.56D41Mazowe33000.862836D6Shavanhowe11660.51589.65D58Nyagui98.324.25142.93D48Mwenje3990.3633.4
The soil loss rate almost doubled in year 2014 as compared to 2008. This can
be explained by the increase in the number of small scale gold miners in the
catchment and alluvial gold panning in streams and rivers. Mining within the
catchment is not only limited to the river beds and banks, miners are also
targeting the inland areas of the catchment such as the Mazowe Valley and
Mufurudzi Game Park and as a result, soil erodibility is also increasing.
Increase in rate of unemployment caused by low capital investment and
continuing closure of industries in Zimbabwe has resulted in the population
resorting to other sources of income such as illegal gold mining and
alluvial gold panning. A study that was carried out in the Lower Manyame sub
– catchment along Dande River, on the analysis of the implications of cross-
sectional coordination of the management of gold panning activities and its
impacts (Zwane et al., 2006), identified river bed gold panning activities as a cause of
degradation of river channels and banks as well as accelerated erosion and
siltation in many areas of Zimbabwe.
Sediment Yield
Figure 4 shows the sediment yield distribution map. Sediment yield ranges
from less than 1 t ha yr-1 to a maximum of 24.5t ha yr-1 with an average
value of 6.04 t ha yr-1 over the catchment area. The highest sediment yield
is in the Middle Mazowe sub catchment area with an average of 6.72 t ha yr-1 and a maximum of 24.5t ha yr-1. The high value can be
associated with high gold panning activities in the Mazowe valley. The
lowest value is in the Lower Ruya sub-catchment with an average of
4 t ha yr-1. The results are almost in line with a study by Rooseboom and
Engineers (1992) that estimated the average sediment yield in the nine
defined sediment regions in Southern Africa to vary between 30 and
330 t ha yr-1 with an average of 15 t ha yr-1. A study which was also
carried out in the catchment area of Pahang River basin in Malasyia gave a
sediment yield ranging from 0–13.79 t ha yr-1 (Kamaludin et al., 2013). The
total sediment yield for the catchment was calculated to be 6.3 million t yr-1.
Sediment Yield within the Catchment.
Summarized Results from the silt survey.
198820032015Capacity at FSL (×106 m3)5.23.4703.194Loss Of Storage (%)033.338.6Dam Surface Area (Ha)93.0074.0064.04Measured Sediment Loads
Results from the measured sediment loads were highest at D75 which is along
Mazowe River, in the Zambezi valley. D41, located in Middle Mazowe sub
catchment recorded a relatively high sediment load of 2836 t. D58 and D6
are both in Nyagui Sub-catchment recorded 142.93 and 589.65 t
respectively. D50, which is in Upper Mazowe sub catchment, recorded a low
figure of 3 t. The results are concurring with those from RUSLE model,
where high sediment yields were recorded from Middle Mazowe and Nyagui sub
catchments respectively.
Sedimentation in Chimhanda Dam from Bathymetric Survey
Table 4 summarizes the results of the silt survey for Chimhanda Dam.
Results for the correlation between sediment yield and water
quality parameters.
The capacity of the dam decreased from the original 5.200 × 106
to 3.470 × 106 and 3.194 × 106 m3 in years 2003 and 2015
respectively. There was 33.3 % loss in storage up to 2003 and a storage
loss of 38.6 % up to 2015 in reference to the design capacity. Figure 5
shows reservoir capacity changes over the years.
Chimhanda Dam Capacity comparison over the years.
Results from the 10 samples of river inflows collected gave an average
sediment concentration of 39 mg L-1. There was a decrease in trend in the
sediment concentration as the rainfall season was progressing. The sediment
accumulation in the reservoir was found to be 330 t yr-1 and the specific
sediment yield was 226 t km-2 yr-1. The usefulness of Chimhanda Dam has
reduced from the initial design life of 50 to 37 years. A study by
Godwin et al. (2011) on Chesa Causeway Weir in the same catchment gave a
specific yield of 510 t km2 yr-1. The usefulness of the dam was
reduced from the initial design life of 50 to 25 years.
Generally the results support the existing literature that most of the small
to medium dams are being affected by high rates of sedimentation in Zimbabwe
(Sawunyama et al., 2006; Godwin et al., 2011; Dalu et al., 2013; Chitata et al., 2014).
Water Quality Trend from Sedimentation
Figures 6 to 10 show the results for the historically measured water
parameters for the years 2000, 2008, 2010 and 2014.
Turbidity
Turbidity variation among sampling points.
Results for the years did not meet the permissible turbidity of 5 NTU. The
highest turbidity values were recorded in 2000 and 2005 respectively. High
values in 2005 corresponds to the high soil loss of 65 t ha yr-1 that was
recorded during that particular year. The high values in 2000 can be
explained by high rainfalls that were experienced during that particular
year as compared with the other years (Met, 2005). Low turbidity values
were recorded during the year 2008, the same year recorded the lowest soil
loss of 36 t ha yr-1. High Turbidity levels are associated with poor water
quality, (Adekunle et al., 2007). WHO (2008) highligted that high turbidity
waters can facilitate the formation of nuclei, where gastrointestinal
disease pathogens can attach. If that water is consumed improperly treated,
it can cause diseases. High turbidity leves also render the treatment of
water expensive.
Total Suspended Solids
Total Suspended Solids variation among sampling points.
2008 values were below the recommended limit of 15 mg L-1 as shown on Fig. 7.
High values were recorded during year 2000, 2005 and 2014. The high values
are in agreement with the high soil loss that were recorded in those
particular years. Total suspended solids are closely related to
sedimentation (Chapman, 1996). When these suspended particles settles at the
bottom of a water body they become sediments. Suspended solids consist of
inorganic and organic fractions. Part of the organic fractions is bacterial
and that might be detrimental to human health if the water is consumed
without adequate treatment (Hoko, 2008).
Dissolved Oxygen (DO)
Dissolved Oxygen variation among sampling points.
Dissolved Oxygen was above the lower limit for EMA at all the stations for
all the years. Year 2000 and 2005 recorded % saturation of 125 and 100
respectively. Oxygen levels can be higher due to excess aquatic plants in
the water which produce oxygen. Most living organisms require oxygen for
their basic metabolic processes.
Nitrates (NO3)
Nitrates variation along sampling points.
Results for nitrates for the years under consideration were all below the
recommended EMA levels of 6 mg L-1. Nitrates are washed by runoff from
agricultural lands into water bodies. High concentration of nitrates in
water bodies cause eutrophication, resulting in competition for oxygen by
aquatic organisms and high water treatment costs (Dike et al., 2010).
PH
pH variations along sampling points.
pH values for all the years were within the normal limits category according
to EMA upper and lower limits of 6 and 9 units respectively. Year 2005 had
one sampling point that had a value slightly lower than the recommended.
Bhadja and Vaghela (2013) indicated that activities in the water shed such
as increased leaching of soils, soil erosion and heavy precipitation affects
the pH levels downstream. pH levels as high as 9.0 and as low as 5 affects
the life span of aquatic organisms (Addo et al., 2011). Low pH values do not
have direct effect to human health, but can have indirectly effect since it
causes leaching of metal irons such as copper, zinc and lead into the water
(WHO, 2008).
Relationship between sedimentation and river water quality
Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship between two water
quality parameters and sediment yield. The parameters are related to
sediment yield and these are turbidity and suspended solids, (Bhadja and
Vaghela, 2013). The results are shown on Table 5.
There is a close positive relationship between turbidity and sediment yield
of 0.63. Total Suspended Solids have a positive relation of 0.64. The
results show that the two water quality parameters can be indicators of
sedimentation. Higher values of total suspended solids and turbidity
indicate higher values of sediment yield in water bodies.
Variation in reservoir water quality
The variation in two selected reservoir water quality indicators, turbidity
and pH was determined. A significant variation in turbidity was noted for
the years 1988 to 2014 with a p-value of 0.02, which is less than 0.05. The
mean value of turbidity for 1988, 2003 and 2014 are 15.6, 34.4 and
41.7 NTU respectively. The values show an increasing trend in turbidity
which may be as a result of anthropogenic activities occurring upstream of
the dam which has resulted in increased soil erosion hence more sediment on
the reservoir. pH results showed that there is no significant change between
1988 and 2014 (p-value > 0.05). This might be because pH is a
chemical parameter that is determined by the type of sediments that are
carried into the river not the sediment load.
Conclusions and recommendationsConclusion
The objective of the study was to analyze sedimentation and its impact on
river system and reservoir water quality in Mazowe Catchment, Zimbabwe. The
study's major findings are,
The catchment is generally experiencing moderate soil loss, however there
are some pockets under high and extreme soil loss which gave rise to
siltation and water quality deterioration of available water bodies.
There is reduction in capacity of reservoirs within the catchment due to
sedimentation. Chimhanda Dam capacity has been reduced by 38.6 % from the
initial design capacity as of April 2015, reducing the usefulness of the dam
to 37 years from the initial design life of 50 years due to siltation.
Sediment deposition in rivers affects water quality and water quality
parameters can be used as an indicator for sedimentation.
Recommendations
In order to curb erosion and sedimentation in rivers and reservoirs, there
is need to develop and implement an integrated water resources management
plan by all stakeholders.
In order to maintain the lifespan of Chimhanda dam, best land management
practices such as contour ploughing and re-forestation should be employed
around the catchment area of the Dam and this is an area that could be
considered for further research.
The main data used in the research is rainfall data that was obtained from the meteorological
department, water quality data obtained from Environmental management Agency as well as sediment Data from Zinwa.
The data can be obtained from these departments.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article is part of the special issue “Water quality and sediment transport issues in surface water”. It is a result of the
IAHS Scientific Assembly 2017, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 10–14 July 2017.
Acknowledgements
This paper contains part of research results from the MSc Thesis of the
corresponding author, Colleta Tundu, submitted to the University of
Zimbabwe. Special thanks go to Faith Chivava for her assistance in GIS.
ZINWA, EMA and the Zimbabwe Meteorological Services Department is
appreciated for providing data.
Edited by: Akhilendra B. Gupta
Reviewed by: Rajendra Prasad and one anonymous referee
References
Addo, M. A., Okley, G. M., Affum, H.A., Acquah, S., Gbadago, J. K., Senu, J. K., and Botwe, B. O.: Water Quality and level of some
heavy metals in water and sediments of Kpeshie Lagoon, La-Accra, Ghana, Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences, 3, 487–497, 2011.
Adekunle, I. M., Adetunji, M. T., Gbadebo, A. M., and Banjoko, O. B.: Assessment of groundwater quality in a typical rural
settlement in Southwest Nigeria, Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He., 4, 307–318, 2007.
Bhadja, P. and Vaghela, A. : Assessment of Physico-Chemical parameters and water quality Index of reservoir water,
International journal of plant animal and environmental sciences, 3, 89–95,
2013.
Chapman, D.: Water quality assessments – A guide to use of Biota, sediments and water in Environmental monitoring, 2nd Edn.,
Chapman and Hall, London, 191–193, 1996.
Chitata, T., Mugabe, F. T., and Kashaigili, J. J.: Estimation of Small Reservoir Sedimentation in Semi-Arid Southern Zimbabwe,
Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 6, 48909, 12–14, 2014.
Dalu, T., Tambara, E. M., Clegg, B., Chari, L. D., and Nhiwatiwa, T.: Modeling sedimentation rates of Malilangwe reservoir in the
south-eastern lowveld of Zimbabwe,
Applied Water Science, 3, 133–144, 2013.
Dearing, J.: Sediment yields and sources in a welsh upland lake-catchment during the past 800 years, Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
17, 1–22, 1992.
de Vente, J., Verduyn, R., Verstraeten, G., Vanmaercke, M., and Poesen, J.: Factors controlling sediment yield at the catchment scale
in NW Mediterranean geoecosystems, J. Soil. Sediment., 11,
690–707, 2011.
Dike, L., Keramat A., and Amirkolaie S.: Environmental impact of nutrient discharged by aquaculture waste water on the Haraz river,
Journal of Agriculture and Biological Science, 3, 275–279, 2010.
EMA: Effluent and Solid Waste Disposal Regulations SI 6, of 2007, government printers of Zimbabwe, 2007.
Eroğlu, H., Çakır, G., Sivrikaya, F., and Akay, A. E.: Using high resolution images and elevation data in classifying
erosion risks of bare soil areas in the Hatila Valley Natural Protected Area,
Turkey,
Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A., 24, 699–704, 2010.
Ezugwu, C.: Sediment Deposition in Nigeria Reservoirs: Impacts and Control Measures,
Innovative Systems Design and Engineering, 4, 54–62, 2013.
Godwin, A. M., Gabriel, S., Hodson, M., and Wellington, D.: Sedimentation impacts on reservoir as a result of land use on a
selected catchment in Zimbabwe, International Journal of Engineering Science & Technology, 3, 2011.
Gusso, A. G. A., Veronez, M. R., Robinson, F., Roani, V., and Da Silva, R. C.:
Evaluating the thermal spatial distribution signature for environmental management and vegetation health monitoring,
International Journal of Advanced Remote Sensing and GIS, 3,
433–445, 2014.
Hanke, S. H. and Kwok, A. K.: On the measurement of Zimbabwe's hyperinflation, Cato J., 29, 353–364, 2009.
Hoko, Z.: An assessment of quality of water from boreholes in Bindura District, Zimbabwe, Phys. Chem. Earth, 33, 824–828, 2008.
Jang, C., Shin, Y., Kum, D., Kim, R., Yang, J. E., Kim, S. C., Hwang, S. I.,
Lim, K. J., Yoon, J.-K., and Park, Y. S.: Assessment of soil loss in South Korea based on land-cover type, Stoch.
Env.
Res.
Risk A., 1–15, 1996.Kamaludin, H., Lihan, T., Ali Rahman, Z., Mustapha, M. A., Idris, W. M. R., and Rahim, S. A.: Integration of remote sensing,
RUSLE and GIS to model potential soil loss and sediment yield (SY), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 10.5194/hessd-10-4567-2013, 2013.
Lawson, E. O.: Physico- chemical parameters and heavy metal contents of water from the mangroves swamps of logos lagon,
logos, Nigeria, Advances in biological research, 5, 8–21, 2011.
Makwara, E. and Gamira, D.: About to Lose all the Soil in Zaka's Ward 5, Zimbabwe: Rewards of Unsustainable Land Use,
European Journal of Sustainable Development,
1, 457–476, 2012.
Mambo, J. and Archer, E.: An assessment of land degradation in the Save catchment of Zimbabwe, Area, 39, 380–391, 2007.
Merritt, W. S., Letcher, R. A., and Jakeman, A. J.: A review of erosion and sediment transport models, Env.
Modell.
Softw., 18, 761–799, 2003.Met: Meteorological data, available at: https://www.wmo.int/datastat/wmodata_en.html|, last access: 3 March 2015.
Mutowo, G. and Chikodzi, D.: Erosion Hazard Mapping in the Runde Catchment: Implications for Water Resources
Management,
Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics, 1,
22–28, 2013.
Pettorelli, N., Vik, J. O., Mysterud, A., Gaillard, J.-M., Tucker, C. J.,
and Stenseth, N. C.: Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental
change,
Trends Ecol. Evol., 20, 503–510, 2005.Renard, K. G., Foster, G. R., Weesies, G. A., McCool, D., and Yoder, D.: Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to
conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE),
Agriculture Handbook, Washington, 703, 1997.
Rooseboom, A. and Engineers, S. B. C.: Sediment transport in rivers and
reservoirs: a Southern African perspective, Water Research Commission, 297/1/92:489, 1992.
Sawunyama, T., Senzanje, A., and Mhizha, A.: Estimation of small reservoir storage capacities in Limpopo River Basin using geographical
information systems (GIS) and remotely sensed surface areas: Case of Mzingwane catchment,
Phys.
Chem.
Earth, 31, 935–943, 2006.
Sumi, T. and Hirose, T.: Accumulation of sediment in reservoirs, Water storage, transport and
distribution,
UNESCO-IHE and EOLSS Publishers Co. Ltd., Paris, France, 224–252, 2009.
Teh, S. H.: Soil erosion modeling using RUSLE and GIS on Cameron highlands, Malaysia for hydropower development,
MS, The School for Renewable Energy Science, Iceland, 41 pp.,2011.
USDA: Procedure for computing sheet and rill equation on project areas, Technical Release No. 51 (Geology),
U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1972.
Walling, D. and Fang, D.: Recent trends in the suspended sediment loads of the world's rivers, Global Planet. change, 39, 111–126, 2003.
Whitlow, R.: Mapping erosion in Zimbabwe: a methodology for rapid survey using aerial photographs, Appl. Geogr.,
6,
149–162, 1986.
WHO: Guidelines for drinking water quality: Third edition incorporating the first and second addenda volume 1 additions, 2008.
Wischmeier, W. and Smith, D.: Predicting rainfall erosion losses. Agricultural Handbook 537, Agricultural Research Service,
United States Department of Agriculture, 1978.
Zinwa, D. R.: Assessment of Surface Water Resources of Zimbabwe and Guidelines for Planning,
in: Management, ZINWA Research and Data Department, Ministry of Water Resources Development and Management
Harare, Zimbabwe, Harare, 59 pp., 2009.
Zwane, N., Love, D., Hoko, Z., and Shoko, D.: Managing the impact of gold panning activities within the context of integrated
water resources management planning in the Lower Manyame Sub-Catchment, Zambezi Basin, Zimbabwe,
Phys. Chem. Earth, 31, 848–856, 2006.