<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \bartext{Water quality and sediment transport issues in surface water}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">PIAHS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">PIAHS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Proc. IAHS</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2199-899X</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/piahs-377-57-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Sedimentation and Its Impacts/Effects on River System and Reservoir Water
Quality: case Study of Mazowe Catchment, Zimbabwe</article-title><alt-title>Sedimentation and Its Impacts/Effects on River System and Reservoir Water
Quality</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Sedimentation and Its Impacts/Effects on River System and Reservoir Water
Quality}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C. Tundu et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tundu</surname><given-names>Colleta</given-names></name>
          <email>ctundu@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Tumbare</surname><given-names>Michael James</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Kileshye Onema</surname><given-names>Jean-Marie</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Zimbabwe National Water Authority, P.O. Box Cy617 Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Civil Engineering, University of Zimbabwe, P.O. Box MP167, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Mt Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>WaterNet  Secretariat, P.O. Box MP600, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Colleta Tundu (ctundu@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>16</day><month>April</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>377</volume>
      <fpage>57</fpage><lpage>66</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>7</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day><month>October</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/377/57/2018/piahs-377-57-2018.html">This article is available from https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/377/57/2018/piahs-377-57-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/377/57/2018/piahs-377-57-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/377/57/2018/piahs-377-57-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e106">Sediment delivery into water sources and bodies results in the reduction of
water quantity and quality, increasing costs of water purification whilst
reducing the available water for various other uses. The paper gives an
analysis of sedimentation in one of Zimbabwe's seven rivers, the Mazowe
Catchment, and its impact on water quality. The Revised Universal Soil Loss
Equation (RUSLE) model was used to compute soil lost from the catchment as a
result of soil erosion. The model was used in conjunction with GIS remotely
sensed data and limited ground observations. The estimated annual soil loss
in the catchment indicates soil loss ranging from 0 to 65 t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Bathymetric survey at Chimhanda Dam showed that the capacity of
the dam had reduced by 39 % as a result of sedimentation and the annual
sediment deposition into Chimhanda Dam was estimated to be 330 t with a
specific yield of 226 t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Relationship between selected water
quality parameters, TSS, DO, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, pH, TDS, turbidity and sediment yield
for selected water sampling points and Chimhanda Dam was analyzed. It was
established that there is a strong positive relationship between the sediment
yield and the water quality parameters. Sediment yield showed high positive
correlation with turbidity (0.63) and TDS (0.64). Water quality data from
Chimhanda treatment plant water works revealed that the quality of water is
deteriorating as a result of increase in sediment accumulation in the dam.
The study concluded that sedimentation can affect the water quality of water
sources.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e161">Sedimentation is a process whereby soil particles are eroded and transported
by flowing water or other transporting media and deposited as layers of
solid particles in water bodies such as reservoirs and rivers. It is a
complex process that varies with watershed sediment yield, rate of
transportation and mode of deposition (Ezugwu, 2013). Sediment deposition
reduces the storage capacity and life span of reservoirs as well as river
flows (Eroglu et al., 2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e164">Sedimentation continues to be one of the most important threats to river
eco-systems around the world. A study was done on the world's 145 major
rivers with consistency long term sediment records and the results show that
about 50 % of the rivers have statistically a significantly downward flow
trend due to sedimentation (Walling and Fang, 2003). Sumi and Hirose (2009) reported that the
global reservoir gross storage capacity is
about 6000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and annual reservoir sedimentation rates are about 31 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.52 %). This suggests that at this sedimentation rate, the
global reservoir storage capacity will be reduced to 50 % by year 2100.</p>
      <p id="d1e185">Studies on some dams in Zimbabwe show that reservoir capacities are being
affected by sedimentation (Sawunyama et al., 2006; Dalu et al., 2013; Chitata et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e188">Water is vital for all anthropogenic activities. Water bodies have been
contaminated with various pollutants due to direct or indirect interference
of men causing an adverse impact on human health and aquatic life (Lawson,
2011). The quality of<?pagebreak page58?> water is getting vastly deteriorated due to improper
land management and carelessness to the environment. Off late sediment
transport in the water bodies has proved to be one of the major contributors
to poor water quality. Due to land degradation and sheet erosion, the top
soil is carried into the water bodies resulting in excess levels of
turbidity. Silt and clay particles are primary carriers of adsorbed
chemicals such as nitrogen and phosphorus.</p>
      <p id="d1e192">This study uses the Mazowe Catchment area as a case study in analyzing river
and reservoir sedimentation and its impact on water quality. Sedimentation
in the rivers and reservoirs within the Mazowe Catchment area has become a
major challenge for the policy makers as well as the water managers.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <title>Study area</title>
      <p id="d1e200">Mazowe Catchment is one of the seven water management catchments in
Zimbabwe. It lies between 16.470<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (latitude) and
18.240<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (latitude) and between 30.680<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E
(longitude) and 33.000<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E (longitude). The catchment has a
total area of 38 005 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and is in the northern part of the country.
There are 30 major dams built along the main river and some of the
tributaries. There are 13 functional gauging stations within the catchment.
The catchment is composed of twenty-four (24) hydrological sub-zones.
Rainfall for the Catchment averages 500 mm to 1200 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> while the mean
annual runoff is 131 mm with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 126 %
(Zinwa, 2009). There are 17 water quality monitoring sampling points
within the catchment. Six (6) sampling water points were selected for the
study, these points were selected basing on the continuity of the available
data meaning to say the points had less missing gaps.</p>
      <p id="d1e261">Chimhanda Dam, in Lower Mazowe Sub-Catchment, was chosen for the assessment
of the levels of sedimentation in resevoirs. Chimhanda Dam is located on the
confluence of Runwa and Mwera Rivers, which are tributaries of Mazowe River.
The dam is located in hydrological sub zone, DM1 with latitude 16<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and longitude 32<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>06<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The dam was completed in 1988 with a
design capacity of 5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and covering a catchment area of
68.7 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which mainly consists of communal lands.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e337">Mazowe Catchment and location of Chimhanda Dam.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/377/57/2018/piahs-377-57-2018-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Data collection</title>
      <p id="d1e358">Remote sensing images of the study area were downloaded from Landsat TM 4-5,
LandSat LE7 and LandSat 8 scene from the website (<uri>https://glovis.usgs.gov/</uri>) for paths 168–170 and rows 71–73 for the
period, 2000, 2005, 2008 and 2014. The study period was selected basing on
the major changes in land use and land cover as a result of the Zimbabwe
land reform programme which started in year 2000 and peaking during year
2003. The composite map was obtained by gluing and merging the tiles from
the different scenes which was performed using Integrated Land and Water
Information System (ILWIS) software. Normalized Differences Vegetation Index
(NDVI) was extracted from the images and this was used to calculate the
cover and management practice factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor). SRTM DEM of 90m resolution
was obtained from Earth Explorer website (<uri>http://EarthExplorer.com</uri>). The DEM was used to calculate the
slope length and slope steepness factor (LS factor). The erodibility factor
was obtained from the soil map of Zimbabwe that was downloaded from website
(<uri>www.fao.org/geonetwork</uri>. Rainfall data was obtained from
the Zimbabwe Meteorological Services Department and was used to come up with
the erosivity factor. The grab sample method was used to obtain samples for
sediment loads from the flow gauges for the 2014/2015 rainfall season.
Historical data for sediment loads from flow gauging stations were obtained
from the Zimbabwe National Water Authority (ZINWA). Historical water quality
data for selected water quality monitoring stations was obtained from
Environmental Management Agency (EMA).</p>
      <p id="d1e377">Siltation historical data for selected reservoirs within the catchment was
obtained from ZINWA. A bathymetric survey was done to assess the level of
sedimentation of Chimhanda dam which lies within the Mazowe Catchment.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page59?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Calculation of RUSLE Factors</title>
      <p id="d1e387">The Revised Universal Soil Erosion (RUSLE) model was used in this study to
calculate the soil that was lost from the catchment. The model predicted the
long term annual loss from the basin and is given by Eq. (1; Renard et al., 1997):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M22" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LS</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> annual soil loss (t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>);
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rain erosivity factor (MJ mm ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil erodibility factor (t ha h MJ<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
LS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> slope length and slope steepness length (m);
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> land cover and crop management;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> management practice.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Rain Erosivity Factor ($R$ factor)}?><title>Rain Erosivity Factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor)</title>
      <p id="d1e558">Rainfall data was processed into average annual rainfall. Rain erosivity was
calculated from the rainfall point map using Eq. (2; Merritt et al., 2003):

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M35" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Rain Erosivity Factor (Joule m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mean Annual Rainfall (mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Soil Erodibility Factor ($K$ factor)}?><title>Soil Erodibility Factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor)</title>
      <p id="d1e643">The soil erodibility factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> Factor) was calculated using Eq. (3) with the
parameters obtained from the soil map (Teh, 2011).

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M42" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9}{9}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Soil Erodibility; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (% fine sand <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>%fine sand)] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (100<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>%clay)
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of organic matter;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Soil Structure;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Permeability.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Land Cover and Crop Management Factor ($C$ factor)}?><title>Land Cover and Crop Management Factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor)</title>
      <p id="d1e809">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor was calculated using the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
(NDVI), which is a tool for assessing changes in vegetation cover
(Pettorelli et al., 2005; Gusso et al., 2014). NDVI was calculated from the
bands using Eq. (4; Deering, 1992).

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M53" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDVI</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NIR</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Red</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NIR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Red</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where NIR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> band 3 for landSat images 1 to 7 and band 4 for landSat 8.
Red <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> band 4 for landSat 1 to 7 and band 5 for landSat 8.</p>
      <p id="d1e868">The calculated NDVI was then used to calculate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor from Eq. (5)

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M57" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">factor</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">map</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12708</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDVI</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">02585</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Management Practice Factor ($P$ Factor)}?><title>Management Practice Factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> Factor)</title>
      <p id="d1e924">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor reflects the control of conservation methods on soil loss. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values range from 0.01 to 1, with the value 0.01 being given to areas of
maximum conservation support and the value 1 being given to areas with
minimal or no conservation practices (Renard et al., 1997). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values
were derived from the land use map of the study area. Different values were
assigned to each type of land use as guided by literature and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor
map was produced (Jang et al., 1996).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Quantifying the sediment yield in the Catchment</title>
      <p id="d1e962">The estimated soil loss was calculated from Eq. (6).

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M63" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LS</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Average Soil Loss (t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>);
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor map;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor map;
LS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> LS factor map;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor map;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor.</p>
      <p id="d1e1094">Soil loss from the catchment cannot be taken as sediment contribution to a
river flow system since it does not account for deposition that occurs along
the path (de Vente et al., 2011). Therefore the estimated soil loss was
multiplied by the sediment delivery ratio (SDR) to obtain the sediment yield
of the catchment. Sediment delivery ratios represent the fraction of the
total soil loss that is washed into rivers and was calculated from using Eq. (7; USDA, 1972).

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M75" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SDR</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">05656</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CA</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where SDR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Sediment Delivery Ratio;
CA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Watershed Area, km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1141">After determination of the sediment delivery ratio, the average sediment
yield was determined using Eq. (8), by Wischmeier and Smith (1978)

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M79" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SDR</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where: SR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Sediment yield (t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>);
SDR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Sediment delivery ratio;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Average soil loss (t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Sediment yield from field measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e1216">Seven out of the thirteen functional ZINWA gauging stations were selected
for collection of sediment concentration samples, (Fig. 2). Water samples
were collected from various flow gauging stations for the period November
2014 to March 2015 using grab sampling method. An average of 20 samples was
collected from each gauging station. The samples were analyzed in a
laboratory using the weighing and filtration method inorder to determine the
sediment concentration in  mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The sediment load was determined by
multiplying the sediment load at a particular gauge by the area of
influence.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e1233">Gauges in the catchment and areas of influence.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/377/57/2018/piahs-377-57-2018-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page60?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Assessing the current sedimentation levels of Chimhanda Dam</title>
      <p id="d1e1249">A bathymetric survey was carried out at Chimhanda dam to determine the
siltation level of the dam. The survey was conducted using a SonTek River
Surveyor system and a theodolite to come up with a basin survey map. The
plotted map was digitized to get the surface area between contours. The area
was then multiplied by the contour interval to get the volume of each
contour using Simpson's formula.

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M86" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">contour</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">contour</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contour Volume (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Area<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Area<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1403">The calculated volumes for each contour were accumulated to get the new
capacity of the dam.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>Water quality trend from sedimentation</title>
      <p id="d1e1412">Water quality historical data from six selected water sampling points were
obtained from the Environmental Management Agency records. The points were
selected basing on the consistency of the data and less gaps. The trend for
the selected water quality parameters, TSS, DO, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, pH, TDS and
turbidity for the corresponding predicted sediment yield years were
analysed. The water quality parameters were compared with the Environmental
Management Agency, Effluent and Solid Waste Disposal Regulations Statutory
Instrument number 6 of 2007 (EMA, 2007) shown on Table 1. Water quality data
for Chimhanda water supply treatment plant from the Zimbabwe National Water
Authority was also related to the change in level of sedimentation of
Chimhanda Dam.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1427">Effluent and solid waste disposal regulations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col6" align="center">BANDS </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PARAMETER</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">Blue </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Green</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Yellow</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Red</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Test</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Methods</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sensitive</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Normal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DO % saturation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">&gt; 75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">&gt; 60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&gt; 50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">&gt; 30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">&gt; 15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SAZS 573</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nitrates NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">&lt; 10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">&lt; 10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">&lt; 30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">&lt; 50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.0–7.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.0–9.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5–6, 9–10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4–5, 10–12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–4, 12–14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SAZS 483</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TDS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">&lt; 100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">&lt; 500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 1500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">&lt; 2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">&lt; 3000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SAZS 576,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Turbidity (NTU)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">&lt; 5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">&lt; 5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SAZS 478</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TSS mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">&lt; 10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">&lt; 25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">&lt; 100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">&lt; 150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SAZS 478</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <title>Investigation the relationship between sedimentation and water
quality</title>
      <p id="d1e1729">Selected water quality parameters were correlated with the corresponding
sediment yield to determine the relationship between sediment yield and
water quality. Pearson Correlation was used to estimate the strength of
relationship between sediment yield and some physical water quality.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Results of the RUSLE factors</title>
      <p id="d1e1744">The erosivity map (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor) depicts rainfall energy in the various areas
within the catchment. The rainfall erosivity ranges between 200 and 500
(MJ mm ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr). A greater part of the catchment is averaging
a rainfall erosivity value of 276 MJ mm ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr. Highest
rainfall erosivity values are in the Kairezi sub-catchment of the study
area. Erodability (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor) values range from 0 to 0.5 t ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> MJ<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Some parts in the south west of the catchment
have high values of erodibility, the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value is dominated by very
fine sand with silt particles which give rise to higher soil erodibility
(Kamaludin et al., 2013). Highest slope length steepness (LS) values of 16 m
were found in the eastern part of the catchment. The northern part of the
catchment experiences average LS values of 7 m.</p>
      <p id="d1e1865">Cover Management and Practice (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor) ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 to 1. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor
is depicted by NDVI which is a function of photosynthesis. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor is
high in the eastern highlands area, some parts of Kairezi sub-catchment and
along the Mufurudzi area. This is possible because the Kairezi area
experiences high rainfall while Mufurudzi being a game park, has more
vegetation. High <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values were observed with high vegetation cover
(Pettorelli et al., 2005). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 1 was observed in Lower Mazowe and
Upper Rwenya subcatchment areas respectively. Areas like Mufurudzi and parts
of Kairezi experienced an average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.8.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Soil loss from the catchment</title>
      <p id="d1e1924">The average annual soil loss for the different years are shown on Fig. 3
and the temporal variation of actual soil loss is tabulated on Table 2.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e1929">Estimated Average Soil Loss for 2000, 2005 2008, and 2014.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/377/57/2018/piahs-377-57-2018-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1938">The estimated soil loss from the catchment ranges from 0 to
203 t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The estimated average soil loss is 54 t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
highest soil loss is being experienced in Middle Mazowe and Nyagui
sub-catchments. High soil loss in Middle Mazowe sub-catchment can be
associated with high gold panning activities in the Mazowe valley whilst in
Nyagui sub-catchment, this can be associated with high crop farming
activities in the area. When the soil is made loose, its structure is
altered hence increase in erodibility.</p>
      <?pagebreak page61?><p id="d1e1965">The average soil loss value of 54 t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concurred with other studies
that were carried out in the country. Whitlow (1986) found that 76 t of
soil is lost per hectare per year through soil erosion in most parts of the
country. Another study by Mutowo and Chikodzi (2013) “Erosion hazards
mapping in the Runde Catchment”, concluded that most of the areas in the
catchment fall in the category range of 0–50 t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Makwara and Gamira (2012) reported that the most serious type of erosion being sheet
erosion, is estimated to remove an average 50 t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from Zimbabwe's
communal lands.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p id="d1e2008">Temporal Variation of Estimated Soil Loss.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Year</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Average Soil</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Loss (t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">54</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2005</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">65</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">36</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">62</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2091">There is no uniform trend in the soil loss over the study period. In year
2000, the soil loss was 54t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The increase of soil loss in 2005
from the 2000 figure can be explained by the land reform programme which
started in year 2000 and was at its peak around 2003. There was a lot of
deforestation as new farmers were clearing land for agricultural purposes
(Mambo and Archer, 2007). Some areas which were meant for animal rearing
and forest were also converted to crop agricultural areas. In 2008 the soil
loss rate decreased to 36 t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The reduction can be attributed to a
number of factors. Year 2008 experienced low erosivity as a result of low
rainfall, which could also lead to low annual soil loss. The economy of
Zimbabwe was almost at a stand-still during the period 2007 to 2009, with an
inflation rate record of over 231 million percent in July 2008 (Hanke
and Kwok, 2009). As a result there was less farming activities during that
period.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2121">Measured sediment Load from flow gauges for the period December
2014 to March 2015.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Silt Gauge</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Name or River</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Area of</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sediment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Load</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Influence (km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">load (t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(t)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mazowe</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20 380</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28536</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nyamasanga</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mupfurudzi</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">163</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">313.56</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mazowe</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3300</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2836</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Shavanhowe</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1166</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">589.65</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nyagui</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">98.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">142.93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mwenje</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">399</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">33.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2332">The soil loss rate almost doubled in year 2014 as compared to 2008. This can
be explained by the increase in the number of small scale gold miners in the
catchment and alluvial gold panning in streams and rivers. Mining within the
catchment is not only limited to the river beds and banks, miners are also
targeting the inland areas of the catchment such as the Mazowe Valley and
Mufurudzi Game Park and as a result, soil erodibility is also increasing.
Increase in rate of unemployment caused by low capital investment and
continuing closure of industries in Zimbabwe has resulted in the population
resorting to other sources of income such as illegal gold mining and
alluvial gold panning. A study that was carried out in the Lower Manyame sub
– catchment along Dande River, on the analysis of the implications of cross-
sectional coordination of the management of gold panning activities<?pagebreak page62?> and its
impacts (Zwane et al., 2006), identified river bed gold panning activities as a cause of
degradation of river channels and banks as well as accelerated erosion and
siltation in many areas of Zimbabwe.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Sediment Yield</title>
      <p id="d1e2340">Figure 4 shows the sediment yield distribution map. Sediment yield ranges
from less than 1 t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to a maximum of 24.5t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average
value of 6.04 t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the catchment area. The highest sediment yield
is in the Middle Mazowe sub catchment area with an average of 6.72 t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a maximum of 24.5t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The high value can be
associated with high gold panning activities in the Mazowe valley. The
lowest value is in the Lower Ruya sub-catchment with an average of
4 t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The results are almost in line with a study by Rooseboom and
Engineers (1992) that estimated the average sediment yield in the nine
defined sediment regions in Southern Africa to vary between 30 and
330 t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average of 15 t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. A study which was also
carried out in the catchment area of Pahang River basin in Malasyia gave a
sediment yield ranging from 0–13.79 t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Kamaludin et al., 2013). The
total sediment yield for the catchment was calculated to be 6.3 million t yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e2466">Sediment Yield within the Catchment.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/377/57/2018/piahs-377-57-2018-f04.jpg"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4"><caption><p id="d1e2478">Summarized Results from the silt survey.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1988</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2015</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Capacity at FSL (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.470</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.194</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Loss Of Storage (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">33.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">38.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dam Surface Area (Ha)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">93.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">74.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">64.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Measured Sediment Loads</title>
      <p id="d1e2594">Results from the measured sediment loads were highest at D75 which is along
Mazowe River, in the Zambezi valley. D41, located in Middle Mazowe sub
catchment recorded a relatively high sediment load of 2836 t. D58 and D6
are both in Nyagui Sub-catchment recorded 142.93 and 589.65 t
respectively. D50, which is in Upper Mazowe sub catchment, recorded a low
figure of 3 t. The results are concurring with those from RUSLE model,
where high sediment yields were recorded from Middle Mazowe and Nyagui sub
catchments respectively.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Sedimentation in Chimhanda Dam from Bathymetric Survey</title>
      <p id="d1e2604">Table 4 summarizes the results of the silt survey for Chimhanda Dam.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5"><caption><p id="d1e2610">Results for the correlation between sediment yield and water
quality parameters.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sediment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ave</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Average</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Turbidity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">TSS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sediment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pearson Correlation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">.634</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">.647</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sig. (2-tailed)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">.366</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">.353</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2716">The capacity of the dam decreased from the original 5.200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
to 3.470 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 3.194 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in years 2003 and 2015
respectively. There was 33.3 % loss in<?pagebreak page63?> storage up to 2003 and a storage
loss of 38.6 % up to 2015 in reference to the design capacity. Figure 5
shows reservoir capacity changes over the years.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e2780">Chimhanda Dam Capacity comparison over the years.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/377/57/2018/piahs-377-57-2018-f05.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2789">Results from the 10 samples of river inflows collected gave an average
sediment concentration of 39 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. There was a decrease in trend in the
sediment concentration as the rainfall season was progressing. The sediment
accumulation in the reservoir was found to be 330 t yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and the specific
sediment yield was 226 t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The usefulness of Chimhanda Dam has
reduced from the initial design life of 50  to 37 years. A study by
Godwin et al. (2011) on Chesa Causeway Weir in the same catchment gave a
specific yield of 510 t km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The usefulness of the dam was
reduced from the initial design life of 50  to 25 years.</p>
      <p id="d1e2862">Generally the results support the existing literature that most of the small
to medium dams are being affected by high rates of sedimentation in Zimbabwe
(Sawunyama et al., 2006; Godwin et al., 2011; Dalu et al., 2013; Chitata et al., 2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Water Quality Trend from Sedimentation</title>
      <p id="d1e2871">Figures 6 to 10 show the results for the historically measured water
parameters for the years 2000, 2008, 2010 and 2014.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS1">
  <title>Turbidity</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p id="d1e2881">Turbidity variation among sampling points.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/377/57/2018/piahs-377-57-2018-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2890">Results for the years did not meet the permissible turbidity of 5 NTU. The
highest turbidity values were recorded in 2000 and 2005 respectively. High
values in 2005 corresponds to the high soil loss of 65 t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> that was
recorded during that particular year. The high values in 2000 can be
explained by high rainfalls that were experienced during that particular
year as compared with the other years (Met, 2005). Low turbidity values
were recorded during the year 2008, the same year recorded the lowest soil
loss of 36 t ha yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. High Turbidity levels are associated with poor water
quality, (Adekunle et al., 2007). WHO (2008) highligted that high turbidity
waters can facilitate the formation of nuclei, where gastrointestinal
disease pathogens can attach. If that water is consumed improperly treated,
it can cause diseases. High turbidity leves also render the treatment of
water expensive.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS2">
  <title>Total Suspended Solids</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p id="d1e2925">Total Suspended Solids variation among sampling points.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/377/57/2018/piahs-377-57-2018-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2934">2008 values were below the recommended limit of 15 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as shown on Fig. 7.
High values were recorded during year 2000, 2005 and 2014. The high values
are in agreement with the high soil loss that were recorded in those
particular years. Total suspended solids are closely related to
sedimentation (Chapman, 1996). When these suspended particles settles at the
bottom of a water body they become sediments. Suspended solids consist of
inorganic and organic fractions. Part of the organic fractions is bacterial
and that might be detrimental to human health if the water is consumed
without adequate treatment (Hoko, 2008).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS3">
  <title>Dissolved Oxygen (DO)</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p id="d1e2957">Dissolved Oxygen variation among sampling points.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/377/57/2018/piahs-377-57-2018-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2966">Dissolved Oxygen was above the lower limit for EMA at all the stations for
all the years. Year 2000 and 2005 recorded % saturation of 125 and 100
respectively. Oxygen levels can be higher due to excess aquatic plants in
the water which<?pagebreak page64?> produce oxygen. Most living organisms require oxygen for
their basic metabolic processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Nitrates (NO${}_{3}$)}?><title>Nitrates (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p id="d1e2988">Nitrates variation along sampling points.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/377/57/2018/piahs-377-57-2018-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2997">Results for nitrates for the years under consideration were all below the
recommended EMA levels of 6 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Nitrates are washed by runoff from
agricultural lands into water bodies. High concentration of nitrates in
water bodies cause eutrophication, resulting in competition for oxygen by
aquatic organisms and high water treatment costs (Dike et al., 2010).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS5">
  <title>PH</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p id="d1e3020">pH variations along sampling points.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/377/57/2018/piahs-377-57-2018-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3029">pH values for all the years were within the normal limits category according
to EMA upper and lower limits of 6 and 9 units respectively. Year 2005 had
one sampling point that had a value slightly lower than the recommended.
Bhadja and Vaghela (2013) indicated that activities in the water shed such
as increased leaching of soils, soil erosion and heavy precipitation affects
the pH levels downstream. pH levels as high as 9.0 and as low as 5 affects
the life span of aquatic organisms (Addo et al., 2011). Low pH values do not
have direct effect to human health, but can have indirectly effect since it
causes leaching of metal irons such as copper, zinc and lead into the water
(WHO, 2008).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Relationship between sedimentation and river water quality</title>
      <p id="d1e3040">Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship between two water
quality parameters and sediment yield. The parameters are related to
sediment yield and these are turbidity and suspended solids, (Bhadja and
Vaghela, 2013). The results are shown on Table 5.</p>
      <p id="d1e3043">There is a close positive relationship between turbidity and sediment yield
of 0.63. Total Suspended Solids have a positive relation of 0.64. The
results show that the two water quality parameters can be indicators of
sedimentation. Higher values of total suspended solids and turbidity
indicate higher values of sediment yield in water bodies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <title>Variation in reservoir water quality</title>
      <p id="d1e3052">The variation in two selected reservoir water quality indicators, turbidity
and pH was determined. A significant variation in turbidity was noted for
the years 1988 to 2014 with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value of 0.02, which is less than 0.05. The
mean value of turbidity for 1988, 2003 and 2014 are 15.6, 34.4 and
41.7 NTU respectively. The values show an increasing trend in turbidity
which may be as a result of anthropogenic activities occurring upstream of
the dam which has resulted in increased soil erosion hence more sediment on
the reservoir. pH results showed that there is no significant change between
1988 and 2014 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value &gt; 0.05). This might be because pH is a
chemical parameter that is determined by the type of sediments that are
carried into the river not the sediment load.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page65?><sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions and recommendations</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e3082">The objective of the study was to analyze sedimentation and its impact on
river system and reservoir water quality in Mazowe Catchment, Zimbabwe. The
study's major findings are,</p>
      <p id="d1e3085">The catchment is generally experiencing moderate soil loss, however there
are some pockets under high and extreme soil loss which gave rise to
siltation and water quality deterioration of available water bodies.</p>
      <p id="d1e3088">There is reduction in capacity of reservoirs within the catchment due to
sedimentation. Chimhanda Dam capacity has been reduced by 38.6 % from the
initial design capacity as of April 2015, reducing the usefulness of the dam
to 37 years from the initial design life of 50 years due to siltation.</p>
      <p id="d1e3091">Sediment deposition in rivers affects water quality and water quality
parameters can be used as an indicator for sedimentation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Recommendations</title>
      <p id="d1e3100">In order to curb erosion and sedimentation in rivers and reservoirs, there
is need to develop and implement an integrated water resources management
plan by all stakeholders.</p>
      <p id="d1e3103">In order to maintain the lifespan of Chimhanda dam, best land management
practices such as contour ploughing and re-forestation should be employed
around the catchment area of the Dam and this is an area that could be
considered for further research.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e3112">The main data used in the research is rainfall data that was obtained from the meteorological
department, water quality data obtained from Environmental management Agency as well as sediment Data from Zinwa.
The data can be obtained from these departments.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e3118">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p id="d1e3124">This article is part of the special issue “Water quality and sediment transport issues in surface water”. It is a result of the
IAHS Scientific Assembly 2017, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 10–14 July 2017.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3130">This paper contains part of research results from the MSc Thesis of the
corresponding author, Colleta Tundu, submitted to the University of
Zimbabwe. Special thanks go to Faith Chivava for her assistance in GIS.
ZINWA, EMA and the Zimbabwe Meteorological Services Department is
appreciated for providing data.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Akhilendra B. Gupta<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: Rajendra Prasad and one anonymous referee</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Addo, M. A., Okley, G. M., Affum, H.A., Acquah, S., Gbadago, J. K., Senu, J. K., and Botwe, B. O.: Water Quality and level of some
heavy metals in water and sediments of  Kpeshie Lagoon, La-Accra, Ghana, Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences, 3, 487–497, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Adekunle, I. M., Adetunji, M. T., Gbadebo, A. M., and Banjoko, O. B.: Assessment of groundwater quality in a typical rural
settlement in Southwest Nigeria, Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He., 4, 307–318, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bhadja, P. and Vaghela, A. : Assessment of Physico-Chemical parameters and water quality Index of reservoir water,
International journal of plant animal and environmental sciences, 3, 89–95,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Chapman, D.: Water quality assessments – A guide to use of Biota, sediments and water in Environmental monitoring, 2nd Edn.,
Chapman and Hall, London, 191–193, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Chitata, T., Mugabe, F. T., and Kashaigili, J. J.: Estimation of Small Reservoir Sedimentation in Semi-Arid Southern Zimbabwe,
Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 6, 48909, 12–14, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Dalu, T., Tambara, E. M., Clegg, B., Chari, L. D., and Nhiwatiwa, T.: Modeling sedimentation rates of Malilangwe reservoir in the
south-eastern lowveld of Zimbabwe,
Applied Water Science, 3, 133–144, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Dearing, J.: Sediment yields and sources in a welsh upland lake-catchment during the past 800 years, Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
17, 1–22, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
de Vente, J., Verduyn, R., Verstraeten, G., Vanmaercke, M., and Poesen, J.: Factors controlling sediment yield at the catchment scale
in NW Mediterranean geoecosystems, J. Soil. Sediment., 11,
690–707, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Dike, L., Keramat A., and Amirkolaie S.: Environmental impact of nutrient discharged by aquaculture waste water on the Haraz river,
Journal of Agriculture and Biological Science, 3, 275–279, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
EMA:  Effluent and Solid Waste Disposal Regulations SI 6, of 2007, government printers of Zimbabwe, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Eroğlu, H., Çakır, G., Sivrikaya, F., and Akay, A. E.: Using high resolution images and elevation data in classifying
erosion risks of bare soil areas in the Hatila Valley Natural Protected Area,
Turkey,
Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A., 24, 699–704, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Ezugwu, C.: Sediment Deposition in Nigeria Reservoirs: Impacts and Control Measures,
Innovative Systems Design and Engineering, 4, 54–62, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Godwin, A. M., Gabriel, S., Hodson, M., and Wellington, D.: Sedimentation impacts on reservoir as a result of land use on a
selected catchment in Zimbabwe, International Journal of Engineering Science &amp; Technology, 3, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gusso, A. G. A., Veronez, M. R., Robinson, F., Roani, V., and Da Silva, R. C.:
Evaluating the thermal spatial distribution signature for environmental management and vegetation health monitoring,
International Journal of Advanced Remote Sensing and GIS, 3,
433–445, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Hanke, S. H. and Kwok, A. K.: On the measurement of Zimbabwe's hyperinflation, Cato J., 29, 353–364, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Hoko, Z.: An assessment of quality of water from boreholes in Bindura District, Zimbabwe,  Phys. Chem. Earth,  33, 824–828, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Jang, C., Shin, Y., Kum, D., Kim, R., Yang, J. E., Kim, S. C., Hwang, S. I.,
Lim, K. J., Yoon, J.-K., and Park, Y. S.: Assessment of soil loss in South Korea based on land-cover type, Stoch.
Env.
Res.
Risk A., 1–15, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Kamaludin, H., Lihan, T., Ali Rahman, Z., Mustapha, M. A., Idris, W. M. R., and Rahim, S. A.: Integration of remote sensing,
RUSLE and GIS to model potential soil loss and sediment yield (SY), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-10-4567-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hessd-10-4567-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Lawson, E. O.: Physico- chemical parameters and heavy metal contents of water from the mangroves swamps of logos lagon,
logos, Nigeria, Advances in biological research, 5, 8–21, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Makwara, E. and Gamira, D.: About to Lose all the Soil in Zaka's Ward 5, Zimbabwe: Rewards of Unsustainable Land Use,
European Journal of Sustainable Development,
1, 457–476, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Mambo, J. and Archer, E.: An assessment of land degradation in the Save catchment of Zimbabwe, Area, 39, 380–391, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Merritt, W. S., Letcher, R. A., and Jakeman, A. J.: A review of erosion and sediment transport models, Env.
Modell.
Softw., 18, 761–799, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Met: Meteorological data, available at: <uri>https://www.wmo.int/datastat/wmodata_en.html|</uri>, last access: 3 March 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Mutowo, G. and Chikodzi, D.: Erosion Hazard Mapping in the Runde Catchment: Implications for Water Resources
Management,
Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics, 1,
22–28, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Pettorelli, N., Vik, J. O., Mysterud, A., Gaillard, J.-M., Tucker, C. J.,
and Stenseth, N. C.: Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental
change,
Trends Ecol. Evol., 20, 503–510,  2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Renard, K. G., Foster, G. R., Weesies, G. A., McCool, D., and Yoder, D.: Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to
conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE),
Agriculture Handbook, Washington, 703, 1997.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Rooseboom, A. and Engineers, S. B. C.: Sediment transport in rivers and
reservoirs: a Southern African perspective, Water Research Commission, 297/1/92:489, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Sawunyama, T., Senzanje, A., and Mhizha, A.: Estimation of small reservoir storage capacities in Limpopo River Basin using geographical
information systems (GIS) and remotely sensed surface areas: Case of Mzingwane catchment,
Phys.
Chem.
Earth, 31, 935–943, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Sumi, T. and Hirose, T.: Accumulation of sediment in reservoirs, Water storage, transport and
distribution,
UNESCO-IHE and EOLSS Publishers Co. Ltd., Paris, France, 224–252, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Teh, S. H.: Soil erosion modeling using RUSLE and GIS on Cameron highlands, Malaysia for hydropower development,
MS, The School for Renewable Energy Science, Iceland, 41 pp.,2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
USDA: Procedure for computing sheet and rill equation on project areas, Technical Release No. 51  (Geology),
U.S.  Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Walling, D. and Fang, D.:  Recent trends in the suspended sediment loads of the world's rivers, Global Planet. change, 39, 111–126, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Whitlow, R.: Mapping erosion in Zimbabwe: a methodology for rapid survey using aerial photographs, Appl. Geogr.,
6,
149–162, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
WHO: Guidelines for drinking water quality: Third edition incorporating the first and second addenda volume 1 additions, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Wischmeier, W. and Smith, D.: Predicting rainfall erosion losses. Agricultural Handbook 537, Agricultural Research Service,
United States Department of Agriculture, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Zinwa, D. R.: Assessment of Surface Water Resources of Zimbabwe and Guidelines for Planning,
in: Management,  ZINWA Research and Data Department, Ministry of Water Resources Development and Management
Harare, Zimbabwe, Harare,  59 pp., 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Zwane, N., Love, D., Hoko, Z., and Shoko, D.: Managing the impact of gold panning activities within the context of integrated
water resources management planning in the Lower Manyame Sub-Catchment, Zambezi Basin, Zimbabwe,
Phys. Chem.  Earth,  31, 848–856, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Sedimentation and Its Impacts/Effects on River System and Reservoir Water Quality: case Study of Mazowe Catchment, Zimbabwe</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Sediment delivery into water sources and bodies results in the reduction of
water quantity and quality, increasing costs of water purification whilst
reducing the available water for various other uses. The paper gives an
analysis of sedimentation in one of Zimbabwe's seven rivers, the Mazowe
Catchment, and its impact on water quality. The Revised Universal Soil Loss
Equation (RUSLE) model was used to compute soil lost from the catchment as a
result of soil erosion. The model was used in conjunction with GIS remotely
sensed data and limited ground observations. The estimated annual soil loss
in the catchment indicates soil loss ranging from 0 to 65 t ha yr<sup>−1</sup>. Bathymetric survey at Chimhanda Dam showed that the capacity of
the dam had reduced by 39 % as a result of sedimentation and the annual
sediment deposition into Chimhanda Dam was estimated to be 330 t with a
specific yield of 226 t km<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. Relationship between selected water
quality parameters, TSS, DO, NO<sub>3</sub>, pH, TDS, turbidity and sediment yield
for selected water sampling points and Chimhanda Dam was analyzed. It was
established that there is a strong positive relationship between the sediment
yield and the water quality parameters. Sediment yield showed high positive
correlation with turbidity (0.63) and TDS (0.64). Water quality data from
Chimhanda treatment plant water works revealed that the quality of water is
deteriorating as a result of increase in sediment accumulation in the dam.
The study concluded that sedimentation can affect the water quality of water
sources.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Addo, M. A., Okley, G. M., Affum, H.A., Acquah, S., Gbadago, J. K., Senu, J. K., and Botwe, B. O.: Water Quality and level of some
heavy metals in water and sediments of  Kpeshie Lagoon, La-Accra, Ghana, Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences, 3, 487–497, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Adekunle, I. M., Adetunji, M. T., Gbadebo, A. M., and Banjoko, O. B.: Assessment of groundwater quality in a typical rural
settlement in Southwest Nigeria, Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He., 4, 307–318, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bhadja, P. and Vaghela, A. : Assessment of Physico-Chemical parameters and water quality Index of reservoir water,
International journal of plant animal and environmental sciences, 3, 89–95,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Chapman, D.: Water quality assessments – A guide to use of Biota, sediments and water in Environmental monitoring, 2nd Edn.,
Chapman and Hall, London, 191–193, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Chitata, T., Mugabe, F. T., and Kashaigili, J. J.: Estimation of Small Reservoir Sedimentation in Semi-Arid Southern Zimbabwe,
Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 6, 48909, 12–14, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Dalu, T., Tambara, E. M., Clegg, B., Chari, L. D., and Nhiwatiwa, T.: Modeling sedimentation rates of Malilangwe reservoir in the
south-eastern lowveld of Zimbabwe,
Applied Water Science, 3, 133–144, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Dearing, J.: Sediment yields and sources in a welsh upland lake-catchment during the past 800 years, Earth Surf. Proc. Land.,
17, 1–22, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
de Vente, J., Verduyn, R., Verstraeten, G., Vanmaercke, M., and Poesen, J.: Factors controlling sediment yield at the catchment scale
in NW Mediterranean geoecosystems, J. Soil. Sediment., 11,
690–707, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Dike, L., Keramat A., and Amirkolaie S.: Environmental impact of nutrient discharged by aquaculture waste water on the Haraz river,
Journal of Agriculture and Biological Science, 3, 275–279, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
EMA:  Effluent and Solid Waste Disposal Regulations SI 6, of 2007, government printers of Zimbabwe, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Eroğlu, H., Çakır, G., Sivrikaya, F., and Akay, A. E.: Using high resolution images and elevation data in classifying
erosion risks of bare soil areas in the Hatila Valley Natural Protected Area,
Turkey,
Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A., 24, 699–704, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Ezugwu, C.: Sediment Deposition in Nigeria Reservoirs: Impacts and Control Measures,
Innovative Systems Design and Engineering, 4, 54–62, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Godwin, A. M., Gabriel, S., Hodson, M., and Wellington, D.: Sedimentation impacts on reservoir as a result of land use on a
selected catchment in Zimbabwe, International Journal of Engineering Science &amp; Technology, 3, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gusso, A. G. A., Veronez, M. R., Robinson, F., Roani, V., and Da Silva, R. C.:
Evaluating the thermal spatial distribution signature for environmental management and vegetation health monitoring,
International Journal of Advanced Remote Sensing and GIS, 3,
433–445, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Hanke, S. H. and Kwok, A. K.: On the measurement of Zimbabwe's hyperinflation, Cato J., 29, 353–364, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Hoko, Z.: An assessment of quality of water from boreholes in Bindura District, Zimbabwe,  Phys. Chem. Earth,  33, 824–828, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Jang, C., Shin, Y., Kum, D., Kim, R., Yang, J. E., Kim, S. C., Hwang, S. I.,
Lim, K. J., Yoon, J.-K., and Park, Y. S.: Assessment of soil loss in South Korea based on land-cover type, Stoch.
Env.
Res.
Risk A., 1–15, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Kamaludin, H., Lihan, T., Ali Rahman, Z., Mustapha, M. A., Idris, W. M. R., and Rahim, S. A.: Integration of remote sensing,
RUSLE and GIS to model potential soil loss and sediment yield (SY), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-10-4567-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-10-4567-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Lawson, E. O.: Physico- chemical parameters and heavy metal contents of water from the mangroves swamps of logos lagon,
logos, Nigeria, Advances in biological research, 5, 8–21, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Makwara, E. and Gamira, D.: About to Lose all the Soil in Zaka's Ward 5, Zimbabwe: Rewards of Unsustainable Land Use,
European Journal of Sustainable Development,
1, 457–476, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Mambo, J. and Archer, E.: An assessment of land degradation in the Save catchment of Zimbabwe, Area, 39, 380–391, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Merritt, W. S., Letcher, R. A., and Jakeman, A. J.: A review of erosion and sediment transport models, Env.
Modell.
Softw., 18, 761–799, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Met: Meteorological data, available at: <a href="https://www.wmo.int/datastat/wmodata_en.html|" target="_blank">https://www.wmo.int/datastat/wmodata_en.html|</a>, last access: 3 March 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Mutowo, G. and Chikodzi, D.: Erosion Hazard Mapping in the Runde Catchment: Implications for Water Resources
Management,
Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics, 1,
22–28, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Pettorelli, N., Vik, J. O., Mysterud, A., Gaillard, J.-M., Tucker, C. J.,
and Stenseth, N. C.: Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental
change,
Trends Ecol. Evol., 20, 503–510,  2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Renard, K. G., Foster, G. R., Weesies, G. A., McCool, D., and Yoder, D.: Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to
conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE),
Agriculture Handbook, Washington, 703, 1997.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Rooseboom, A. and Engineers, S. B. C.: Sediment transport in rivers and
reservoirs: a Southern African perspective, Water Research Commission, 297/1/92:489, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Sawunyama, T., Senzanje, A., and Mhizha, A.: Estimation of small reservoir storage capacities in Limpopo River Basin using geographical
information systems (GIS) and remotely sensed surface areas: Case of Mzingwane catchment,
Phys.
Chem.
Earth, 31, 935–943, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Sumi, T. and Hirose, T.: Accumulation of sediment in reservoirs, Water storage, transport and
distribution,
UNESCO-IHE and EOLSS Publishers Co. Ltd., Paris, France, 224–252, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Teh, S. H.: Soil erosion modeling using RUSLE and GIS on Cameron highlands, Malaysia for hydropower development,
MS, The School for Renewable Energy Science, Iceland, 41 pp.,2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
USDA: Procedure for computing sheet and rill equation on project areas, Technical Release No. 51  (Geology),
U.S.  Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Walling, D. and Fang, D.:  Recent trends in the suspended sediment loads of the world's rivers, Global Planet. change, 39, 111–126, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Whitlow, R.: Mapping erosion in Zimbabwe: a methodology for rapid survey using aerial photographs, Appl. Geogr.,
6,
149–162, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
WHO: Guidelines for drinking water quality: Third edition incorporating the first and second addenda volume 1 additions, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Wischmeier, W. and Smith, D.: Predicting rainfall erosion losses. Agricultural Handbook 537, Agricultural Research Service,
United States Department of Agriculture, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Zinwa, D. R.: Assessment of Surface Water Resources of Zimbabwe and Guidelines for Planning,
in: Management,  ZINWA Research and Data Department, Ministry of Water Resources Development and Management
Harare, Zimbabwe, Harare,  59 pp., 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Zwane, N., Love, D., Hoko, Z., and Shoko, D.: Managing the impact of gold panning activities within the context of integrated
water resources management planning in the Lower Manyame Sub-Catchment, Zambezi Basin, Zimbabwe,
Phys. Chem.  Earth,  31, 848–856, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
