<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \bartext{Water Resources Assessment and Seasonal Prediction}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">PIAHS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">PIAHS</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Proc. IAHS</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2199-899X</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/piahs-374-137-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Seasonal forecast of Kharif flows from Upper <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Jhelum catchment</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Seasonal forecast of Kharif flows from Upper Jhelum catchment}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{W. Bogacki and M.~F.~Ismail}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bogacki</surname><given-names>Wolfgang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Ismail</surname><given-names>M. Fraz</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Architectural and Civil Engineering, University of
Applied Sciences, Koblenz, 56075, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>National Engineering Services (Pvt) Limited, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">W. Bogacki (bogacki@hs-koblenz.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>17</day><month>October</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>374</volume>
      <fpage>137</fpage><lpage>142</lpage>
      
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/374/137/2016/piahs-374-137-2016.html">This article is available from https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/374/137/2016/piahs-374-137-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/374/137/2016/piahs-374-137-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/374/137/2016/piahs-374-137-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>An operational hydrological forecast model was set-up based on the
Snowmelt-Runoff Model (SRM) in order to forecast Kharif flows from Upper
Jhelum catchment. Zone-wise degree-day factor functions were derived by
diagnostic calibration and are applied according to a defined temperature
rule when melting starts. While predicting the depletion of snow-covered area
by SRM's modified depletion curve approach, scenario runs with temperature
and precipitation of past years are carried out which are evaluated
statistically to forecast the seasonal flow volume.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Irrigated agriculture provides 90 % of Pakistan's food requirements,
22 % of its Gross Domestic Product and provides employment to 60 % of
the population of the country (Euroconsult, 2011). Pakistan ranks 5th in
rice export and 8th in wheat production in the world (FAO, 2011).
Consequently, agriculture's share in water usage is about 97 %, which is
well above the global average of about 70 % (Akram, 2009). The Indus
Basin Irrigation System, comprising a canal command area of more than
14 million ha, is one of the largest contiguous irrigation systems of the
world. On average, annual canal water diversion from River Indus and its
major tributaries amounts to about 130 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Flows in the Indus Basin mainly originate from the high mountain ranges of
the Western Himalaya – Karakoram – Hindu Kush region. Though the flow
regime also comprises glacier melt and runoff from rainfall during monsoon
season, the predominant contribution comes from the melting of seasonal snow
accumulated during the preceding winter and spring (Archer et al., 2010).
Depending on the altitude of the catchment, flows originating from snowmelt
start to rise in March to April. Average monthly flow volumes reach their
peak in May to July.</p>
      <p>Expected flows during the forthcoming Kharif cropping season (April–September) are forecasted by end of March. Based on these forecasts, the
Indus River System Authority (IRSA) decides the provincial shares and the
provincial irrigation departments subsequently determine the seasonal water
allocation to the different canal command areas. A reliable seasonal
forecast of the water resources to be expected from snowmelt is therefore of
utmost importance for the agricultural production.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Study area</title>
      <p>One of only two major reservoirs in Pakistan, the Mangla reservoir, is
located at the foothills of the Western Himalayas on Jhelum river (Fig. 1).
After a dam raising project completed in 2009, the storage capacity is 9.1 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
equivalent to about 35 % of mean annual flow in Jhelum river
which was approx. 26 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during the period 2003–2011. The snowmelt
contribution to annual flows is about 50 % on average, with variations
between 45–60 % from year to year. While average monthly flow in
Jhelum river starts rising already in February reaching its maximum in May
(Fig. 2), peak flood events usually occur during monsoon season in July–September.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Landsat TM scene of study area.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/374/137/2016/piahs-374-137-2016-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The catchment of Jhelum River upstream of Mangla dam has an area of about
33 500 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a mean hypsometric elevation of nearly 2400 m a.s.l. The
lowest elevation at Mangla is about 300 m a.s.l. whilst the highest peak has an
altitude of 6285 m. Due to its comparatively low altitude, according to the
GLIMS glacier database (Paul and Frey, 2010) only 0.7 % of the catchment
is covered by glaciers or perennial snow thus having no major impact to the
flow regime.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Snowmelt modelling approach</title>
      <p>Snowmelt is a complex physical process that is primarily driven by the
energy flux entering the snowpack. Two categories of snowmelt models exists:
energy balance models attempt to quantify the components of the heat balance
equation while temperature index models use air temperature as a principal
predictor of melt rates. Temperature index models have been widely used as
they offer generally a good model performance while data requirements are
comparatively low which is of particular importance in remote and rugged
mountainous catchments like in the Himalaya – Karakoram – Hindu Kush
region. Among the class of temperature index models SRM (Martinec, 1975) has
become very popular in conjunction with the increasing availability of
remote sensing snow cover data, as it circumvents the error prone snow
accumulation approach used by other models.</p>
      <p>An Excel<sup>®</sup> version (Bogacki and Hashmi, 2013)
of WinSRM (Martinec et al., 2011) was developed in order to allow for changes
in the underlying code like the handling of heavy rainfalls that had to be
adapted to the catchment characteristics. Furthermore,
Excel<sup>®</sup> is well known to most engineers who
can easily adapt the layout or data structure to their specific needs.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Distribution of monthly inflow to Mangla reservoir 2000–2014.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/374/137/2016/piahs-374-137-2016-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Data sources</title>
      <p>SRM uses air temperature, snow covered area, and precipitation as daily
input variables. The watershed is divided into elevation zones using their
mean hypsometric elevation as reference for zone-wise degree-day
calculation.</p>
      <p>There are three high elevation climate stations in the Pakistani part of the
Upper Jhelum catchment operated by WAPDA's<fn id="Ch1.Footn1"><p>Pakistan Water and
Power Development Authority</p></fn> Snow and Ice Hydrology Project, namely Pir
Chenasi at 2650, Shogran at 2930 and Saif-ul-Maluk at 3200 m a.s.l. However
none of them has a continuous series of daily data over a longer period and
permanent data accessibility that is needed for an operational forecast
model. Thus, the WMO climate station at Srinagar airport located at an
altitude of 1587 m a.s.l. was chosen as temperature base station, of which a
full set of climatic data can be obtained online from the GSOD<fn id="Ch1.Footn2"><p>Global Summary Of the Day. Download at: <uri>ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/gsod/</uri> (NCDC, 2010)</p></fn> data-base with a time-lag of
about 2 days only. Degree-days in each elevation zone are calculated using a
constant temperature lapse-rate of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The MODIS (Terra) Snow Cover Daily product<fn id="Ch1.Footn3"><p>Moderate-resolution
imaging spectro-radiometer <uri>ftp://n5eil01u.ecs.nsidc.org/SAN/MOST/MOD10A1.005/</uri> (Hall et all., 2006)</p></fn> with a spatial resolution
of approx. 500 m is used to determine the snow cover of the catchment. As
the sensor cannot detect snow below clouds, a cloud elimination algorithm is
applied using temporal interpolation between two cloud-free days for each
pixel. Afterwards the daily percentage of snow cover area in each elevation
zone is calculated and smoothed by moving average.</p>
      <p>As spatial interpolation of daily precipitation station data in mountainous
regions is particularly difficult, the remote sensing based RFE 2.0 South
Asia<fn id="Ch1.Footn4"><p>RainFall Estimates version 2.0 created by the NOAA Climate
Prediction Center's FEWS-NET group (2011–2015) sponsored by USAID. Download at:
<uri>ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/fews/S.Asia/data/</uri></p></fn> daily rainfall
product (Xie et al., 2002) is used. According to SRM's elevation band
approach, the gridded data having a spatial resolution of approx. 10 km is
mapped to the respective elevation zones.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Model parameters</title>
      <p>The most important model parameter controlling daily snowmelt is the
degree-day factor [cm <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>], which transforms the
index variable degree-day [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C d] into actual melt [cm d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>].
In a first step, best-fitting degree-day factors were obtained in 10-days
intervals for each elevation zone by diagnostic calibration matching
observed Mangla inflows with the simulated ones.</p>
      <p>The degree-day factor generally increases during melt season as the snowpack
becomes “ripe” due to accumulation of energy by the time (e.g. Martinec et
al., 2011; Hock, 2003). This process happens later at higher elevation zones
as temperatures are lower but the increase is quicker than in the lower
zones, as energy input by solar radiation is longer in effect until actual
melting starts. In order to develop a generalised rule as needed in the
forecasting procedure, zone-wise degree-day factor functions (Ismail et al.,
2015) where developed. The relation of degree-day factors versus time, i.e.
the 10-days periods, was plotted for each elevation zone for all calibrated
years, using the first period when the increase commences as starting point.
Figure 3 shows the evolution of degree-day factors by time for elevation
zones 6 (2500–3000 m a.s.l.) and 9 (4000–4500 m a.s.l.) respectively.
Finally a degree-day factor function was developed by linear regression for
each elevation zone of Upper Jhelum catchment (Table 1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Increase of degree-day factors with time (10-days periods) after
melting start for elevation zones 6 and 9. Degree-day factors are obtained
by diagnostic calibration.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/374/137/2016/piahs-374-137-2016-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The start of melting in each zone differs from year to year, depending on
the actual temperature development during spring. Based on average 10-days
period temperatures, a forecast rule was developed controlling when to start
the respective degree-day factor function in a particular zone. These
threshold temperature values decrease from 6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the lower to
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the upper elevation zones.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Zone-wise degree-day factors depending on 10-days periods after
melting start.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col8">Elevation zone </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Period</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1 – 5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.49</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.65</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.80</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparison of annual and Kharif (April–September) mean absolute
volumetric error [%] of 10-daily flow forecasts using (a) scenario
approach, (b) NCEP, and (c) ECMWF 15-days weather forecasts.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center">Annual error [%] </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col8" align="center">Kharif error [%] </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Year</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Scenario</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NCEP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ECMWF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Scenario</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">NCEP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">ECMWF</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2007</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">22.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">23.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">32.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">17.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">27.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">13.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Average</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">19.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The other model parameters required by SRM like temperature lapse-rate,
recession coefficient, runoff coefficient for snow, lag-time, etc., were
applied basin-wide and kept constant for all years. The values of these
parameters were determined according to the methods described by Martinec et
al. (2011) and slightly adjusted to achieve a good fit over the whole
calibration period. Only the procedure of adjusting the recession
coefficient for heavy rainfalls, which is hard coded in WinSRM had to be
adapted to the catchment characteristics, as otherwise peak runoffs were
heavily overestimated.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Forecasting approach</title>
      <p>The main objective of the Upper Jhelum snowmelt runoff model is the
operational forecast of water availability in the Kharif cropping season
(April–September) but the model is also utilised for 10-daily forecasts
in order to fine-tune irrigation water distribution during the season.
Because medium-term weather forecasts were deemed more promising than
long-term seasonal, in a first analysis 10-daily flow hindcasts were carried
out using 15-days temperature and precipitation forecasts from
NCEP<fn id="Ch1.Footn5"><p>National Centers for Environmental Prediction, USA
(<uri>http://www.ncep.noaa.gov/</uri>)</p></fn> and ECMWF<fn id="Ch1.Footn6"><p>European
Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (<uri>http://www.ecmwf.int/</uri>)</p></fn> weather forecast models obtained from the
TIGGE<fn id="Ch1.Footn7"><p>TIGGE (<uri>http://tigge.ecmwf.int/</uri>), the THORPEX
Interactive Grand Global Ensemble, is a key component of the World Weather
Research Programme to accelerate the improvements in the accuracy of 1 day
to 2 week high-impact weather forecasts.</p></fn> archive. However flow predictions
based on these weather forecasts were found inferior compared to a scenario
approach as described below (Table 2). Thus for the seasonal forecasts only
the scenario approach was taken into consideration.</p>
      <p>When forecasting the three model variables snow-covered area, temperature,
and precipitation have to be predicted. In order to estimate the future
depletion of the snow-covered area SRM uses so called “modified depletion
curves” which are derived from the conventional depletion curves of each
elevation zone by replacing the time scale with the cumulative daily
snow-melt depth (Martinec et al., 2011). The decline of the modified
depletion curves depends on the initial accumulation of snow and represents
the actual snow-water equivalent. When initial snow depth is low the
modified depletion curve declines faster than in years when a lot of snow
has accumulated.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Results of validation of final flow forecast model (dashed line)
compared to observed inflows to Mangla reservoir (solid line) for the year
2011. The graph also shows at the bottom rainfall and snowmelt depth [cm d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>].</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/374/137/2016/piahs-374-137-2016-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>End of March, when the seasonal forecast is carried out, an elevation zone
showing already some decline in snow-covered area, and hence having also
some cumulated degree-days, is chosen as “key zone”. Comparing the
relation of decline in snow-covered area versus cumulated degree-days with a
statistical analysis of the modified depletion curves of previous years the
actual amount of snow is estimated and the future depletion anticipated
accordingly, while assuming similar snow conditions for all elevation zones.</p>
      <p>While the snow-covered area and its depletion is calculated only once for
the actual season to be forecasted, scenario runs are carried out with
historic temperature and precipitation data-sets of various years. This
results in an ensemble of predicted seasonal flows representing historic
weather conditions from which by statistical analysis a forecast of “most
likely” (median) as well as expected flows under “dry” or “wet”
conditions can be derived.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p>The final flow forecast model, i.e. using fixed model parameters as well as
the developed degree-day factor functions and the start rule as described in
Sect. 3.4, was validated for the series of years 2002–2011. The relative
volume difference <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the coefficient of determination <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
according to the Eqs. (1) and (2):
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        These equations are used as model accuracy criteria, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the observed and the simulated annual flow volumes, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the observed and the simulated daily discharge values,
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the average observed daily discharge.</p>
      <p>The years 2002 and 2011 that had not been used for parameter calibration and
determination of the degree-day factor functions resulted in an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
0.89 for each year and a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 2.3 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.8 % respectively
(NESPAK and AHT, 2012). The total series of years has an average <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
0.83 and an average absolute volume error of 4.3 %. Figure 4 gives an
example of simulated versus observed inflow hydrograph.</p>
      <p>The forecast capability of the developed model was evaluated by hindcasts
for the years 2000–2011 using the same procedures as developed for the
operational seasonal forecasts. Meanwhile, real forecasts exist for the
Kharif seasons of the years 2012–2015. Results are compared with IRSA's
forecasts that are based on a statistical approach and with forecasts from
the UBC<fn id="Ch1.Footn8"><p>University of British Columbia Watershed Model</p></fn> watershed
model (Quick and Pipes, 1977) that is used by WAPDA's Snow and Ice Hydrology
Project. Figure 5 shows a comparison of the relative error of the forecasted
Kharif flow volumes by the different approaches. SRM in conjunction with the
scenario approach generally predicts Kharif flows with an error of less than
10 %, in many years of less than 5 %. The year 2010 was exceptional, as
there was an approx. 200 years flood event in the monsoon season.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Statistics of relative error of Kharif flow volume forecasts by
IRSA's statistical approach, UBC watershed model, and SRM. SRM 2000–2011
are hindcasts, all other forecasts. The series include the approx. 200 years
flood in 2010.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/374/137/2016/piahs-374-137-2016-f05.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The quite good accuracy of seasonal flow prediction in the Upper Jhelum
catchment might be due to a combination of favourable factors. One is
definitely SRM's good approximation of the actual snow situation at the
start of the melting season by utilising the MODIS snow-cover remote-sensing
data in conjunction with the modified depletion curve approach. Once the
amount of available snow is known, it is most likely, that all snow is
melted during the Kharif season.</p>
      <p>In addition, the variability of the second important flow component, i.e.
rainfall from westerly disturbances in spring and monsoon events in summer,
is sufficiently considered by the scenario approach, which transforms the
inter-annual variation of precipitation into a series of seasonal flows that
can be statistically evaluated. The use of the gridded precipitation product
RFE, although it sometimes over- or underestimates a single rainfall event
considerably, might also be favourable in that context as the spatial
distribution seems to be more fitting as any interpolation of station data
in such mountainous regions.</p>
      <p>In order to further improve the seasonal forecast capability of the scenario
approach, research is under way on the early identification of cold/warm
respectively dry/wet years e.g. correlated to the ENSO<fn id="Ch1.Footn9"><p>El Niño
Southern Oscillation</p></fn> status, which might allow for a more specific
selection of a subset of corresponding historic years.</p>
      <p>Considering that the error in predicting the Kharif flow volume is less than
10 % in 14 out of 16 years with a mean absolute error in this period of
6.4 % it can be stated that the combination of SRM with remote sensing
data and the scenario approach has proven to be a reliable procedure for
operational seasonal flow forecasting in the Upper Jhelum catchment.
Furthermore this approach could be easily improved if the meteorological
characteristics of the forthcoming Kharif season can be teleconnected to
global climatic conditions like the ENSO status during the winter.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The study was carried out as part of the project “Upgrading of Tools, Water
Resources Database, Management Systems and Models” under sub component
“B1”
of World Bank financed “PK Water Sector Capacity Building &amp; Advisory
Services Project” (WCAP): P110099. The authors thank National Engineering
Services Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd. (NESPAK), Lahore and AHT Group AG, Essen,
Germany that they could be part of the project team. They are highly
grateful to civil engineering department of University of Engineering and
Technology Lahore and civil engineering department of Hochschule Koblenz,
University of Applied Sciences, for supporting subsequent research and wish
also to express their high gratitude to Indus River System Authority (IRSA)
and WAPDA's Snow and Ice Hydrology Project for sharing their forecast
results.</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Akram, A. A.: Indus Basin water resources, Tiempo, Issue 70, <uri>http://www.environmentportal.in/files/Indus Basin.pdf</uri> (last access: 8 August 2016), 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Archer, D. R., Forsythe, N., Fowler, H. J., and Shah, S. M.: Sustainability
of water resources management in the Indus Basin under changing climatic and
socio economic conditions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1669–1680,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1669-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-14-1669-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bogacki, W. and Hashmi, D.: Impact of Climate Change on the Flow Regime of
the Mangla Basin. GWSP Conference “Water in the Anthropocene: Challenges for
Science and Governance. Indicators, Thresholds and Uncertainties of the
Global Water System”, Bonn, Germany, May 2013, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1934.6167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.13140/RG.2.1.1934.6167</ext-link> (last access: 8 August 2016), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Euroconsult Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd.: Handbook on Water Statistics of Pakistan,
Water Sector Capacity Building and Advisory Services Project (WCAP), March
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>FAO: Pakistan and FAO achievements and success stories,
<uri>http://www.fao.org/3/a-at014e.pdf</uri> (last access: 8 August 2016), 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Hall, D. K., Salomonson, V. V., and Riggs, G. A.: MODIS/Terra Snow Cover Daily L3
Global 500 m Grid V005 [February 2000–September 2015], NSIDC Boulder,
Colorado USA, updated daily, <uri>ftp://n5eil01u.ecs.nsidc.org/SAN/MOST/MOD10A1.005/</uri>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Hock, R.: Temperature index melt modelling in mountain areas, J. Hydro., 282,
104–115, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Ismail, M. F., Rehman, H., Bogacki, W., and Noor, M.: Degree Day Factor
Models for Forecasting the Snowmelt Runoff for Naran Watershed, Sci. Int.
Lahore, 27, 1961–1969, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Martinec, J.: Snowmelt-Runoff Model for Stream Flow Forecasts, Nord. Hydrol.,
6, 145–154, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Martinec, J., Rango, A., and Roberts, R.: Snowmelt Runoff Model User's
Manual, WinSRM Version 1.14. Agricultural Experiment Station Special Report
100, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>NCDC: Global Surface Summary of the Day – GSOD, Version 7 [January 2000–September 2015],
National Climatic Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce,
Asheville, North Carolina USA, <uri>ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/gsod/</uri>, updated daily,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
NESPAK and AHT: Hydrological Flow Forecast Model for Mangla Catchment, Upgrading
of Tools, Water Resources Database, Management Systems and Models Under Sub
Component “B1” of WCAP, Final Report, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>NOAA Climate Prediction Center's FEWS-NET group: RainFall Estimates version
2.0, <uri>ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/fews/S.Asia/data/</uri>, May 2001–September
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Paul, F. (submitter), Frey, H., and Paul, F. (analysts): GLIMS Glacier
Database, Boulder, CO, National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Quick, M. C. and Pipes, A.: UBC watershed model, Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 221,
153–161, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, P., Yarosh, Y., Love, T., Jonowiak, J. E., and Arkin, P. A.: A real-time
daily precipitation analysis over south asia. Preprint of the 16th Conference
on Hydrology, Orlando, Florida, American Meteorological Society, Washington
DC, USA, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Seasonal forecast of Kharif flows from Upper  Jhelum catchment</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">An operational hydrological forecast model was set-up based on the
Snowmelt-Runoff Model (SRM) in order to forecast Kharif flows from Upper
Jhelum catchment. Zone-wise degree-day factor functions were derived by
diagnostic calibration and are applied according to a defined temperature
rule when melting starts. While predicting the depletion of snow-covered area
by SRM's modified depletion curve approach, scenario runs with temperature
and precipitation of past years are carried out which are evaluated
statistically to forecast the seasonal flow volume.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Akram, A. A.: Indus Basin water resources, Tiempo, Issue 70, <a href="http://www.environmentportal.in/files/Indus Basin.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.environmentportal.in/files/Indus Basin.pdf</a> (last access: 8 August 2016), 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Archer, D. R., Forsythe, N., Fowler, H. J., and Shah, S. M.: Sustainability
of water resources management in the Indus Basin under changing climatic and
socio economic conditions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1669–1680,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1669-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/hess-14-1669-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bogacki, W. and Hashmi, D.: Impact of Climate Change on the Flow Regime of
the Mangla Basin. GWSP Conference “Water in the Anthropocene: Challenges for
Science and Governance. Indicators, Thresholds and Uncertainties of the
Global Water System”, Bonn, Germany, May 2013, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1934.6167" target="_blank">doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.1934.6167</a> (last access: 8 August 2016), 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Euroconsult Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd.: Handbook on Water Statistics of Pakistan,
Water Sector Capacity Building and Advisory Services Project (WCAP), March
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
FAO: Pakistan and FAO achievements and success stories,
<a href="http://www.fao.org/3/a-at014e.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.fao.org/3/a-at014e.pdf</a> (last access: 8 August 2016), 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, D. K., Salomonson, V. V., and Riggs, G. A.: MODIS/Terra Snow Cover Daily L3
Global 500 m Grid V005 [February 2000–September 2015], NSIDC Boulder,
Colorado USA, updated daily, <a href="ftp://n5eil01u.ecs.nsidc.org/SAN/MOST/MOD10A1.005/" target="_blank">ftp://n5eil01u.ecs.nsidc.org/SAN/MOST/MOD10A1.005/</a>, 2006.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Hock, R.: Temperature index melt modelling in mountain areas, J. Hydro., 282,
104–115, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Ismail, M. F., Rehman, H., Bogacki, W., and Noor, M.: Degree Day Factor
Models for Forecasting the Snowmelt Runoff for Naran Watershed, Sci. Int.
Lahore, 27, 1961–1969, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Martinec, J.: Snowmelt-Runoff Model for Stream Flow Forecasts, Nord. Hydrol.,
6, 145–154, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Martinec, J., Rango, A., and Roberts, R.: Snowmelt Runoff Model User's
Manual, WinSRM Version 1.14. Agricultural Experiment Station Special Report
100, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
NCDC: Global Surface Summary of the Day – GSOD, Version 7 [January 2000–September 2015],
National Climatic Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce,
Asheville, North Carolina USA, <a href="ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/gsod/" target="_blank">ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/gsod/</a>, updated daily,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
NESPAK and AHT: Hydrological Flow Forecast Model for Mangla Catchment, Upgrading
of Tools, Water Resources Database, Management Systems and Models Under Sub
Component “B1” of WCAP, Final Report, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
NOAA Climate Prediction Center's FEWS-NET group: RainFall Estimates version
2.0, <a href="ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/fews/S.Asia/data/" target="_blank">ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/fews/S.Asia/data/</a>, May 2001–September
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Paul, F. (submitter), Frey, H., and Paul, F. (analysts): GLIMS Glacier
Database, Boulder, CO, National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Quick, M. C. and Pipes, A.: UBC watershed model, Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 221,
153–161, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, P., Yarosh, Y., Love, T., Jonowiak, J. E., and Arkin, P. A.: A real-time
daily precipitation analysis over south asia. Preprint of the 16th Conference
on Hydrology, Orlando, Florida, American Meteorological Society, Washington
DC, USA, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
