<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \bartext{Prevention and mitigation of natural and anthropogenic hazards due to land subsidence}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">PIAHS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">PIAHS</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Proc. IAHS</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2199-899X</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/piahs-372-449-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Examples of deformation-dependent flow simulations of conjunctive use with MF-OWHM</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Examples of Deformation-Dependent Flow Simulations}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{R.~T.~Hanson et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hanson</surname><given-names>R. T.</given-names></name>
          <email>rthanson@usgs.gov</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Traum</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Boyce</surname><given-names>S. E.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schmid</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hughes</surname><given-names>J. D.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>U.S. Geological Survey, 4165 Spruance Rd. Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92101, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">R. T. Hanson (rthanson@usgs.gov)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>November</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>372</volume>
      <issue>372</issue>
      <fpage>449</fpage><lpage>453</lpage>
      
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/449/2015/piahs-372-449-2015.html">This article is available from https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/449/2015/piahs-372-449-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/449/2015/piahs-372-449-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/449/2015/piahs-372-449-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The dependency of surface- and groundwater flows and aquifer
hydraulic properties on deformation induced by changes in aquifer head is
not accounted for in the standard version of MODFLOW. A new USGS integrated
hydrologic model, MODFLOW-OWHM, incorporates this dependency by linking
subsidence and mesh deformation with changes in aquifer transmissivity and
storage coefficient, and with flows that also depend on aquifer
characteristics and land-surface geometry. This new deformation-dependent
approach is being used for the further development of the integrated Central
Valley hydrologic model (CVHM) in California. Preliminary results from this
application and from hypothetical test cases of similar systems show that
changes in canal flows, stream seepage, and evapotranspiration from
groundwater (ET<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) are sensitive to deformation. Deformation feedback
has been shown to also have an indirect effect on conjunctive surface- and
groundwater use components with increased stream seepage and streamflows
influencing surface-water deliveries and return flows. In the Central Valley
model, land subsidence may significantly degrade the ability of the major
canals to deliver surface water from the Delta to the San Joaquin and Tulare
basins. Subsidence can also affect irrigation demand and ET<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gw</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which,
along with altered surface-water supplies, causes a feedback response
resulting in changed estimates of groundwater pumping for irrigation. This
modeling feature also may improve the impact assessment of
dewatering-induced land subsidence/uplift (following irrigation pumping or
coal-seam gas extraction) on surface receptors, inter-basin transfers, and
surface infrastructure integrity.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Plan view of model domain, grid resolution, boundary conditions,
distribution of farms and farm wells, and streamflow routing network with
points of diversion to farms and points of return flow from farms and
surface-water canal traversing urban area (Schmid et al., 2014).</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/449/2015/piahs-372-449-2015-f01.png"/>

    </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S1">
  <title>Introduction and background</title>
      <p>With conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater, excessive groundwater
withdrawals in alluvial aquifers can lead to a physical reconfiguration of
hydrostratigraphy, aquifer properties, surface infrastructure, and
conjunctive water-use management owing to the effects of land subsidence.
This has occurred in many of the major alluvial aquifers throughout the
world. For example, in California's Central Valley, groundwater pumping
resulting from the growing irrigation demand has led to significant land
subsidence in the areas of the western San Joaquin Valley (Faunt et al.,
2009, 2011) and, to the south, in the Tulare Basin, where historical
declines in groundwater levels were greatest and are predicted to continue
with climate change (Hanson et al., 2012). Subsidence and differential
subsidence also are affecting the integrity and efficiency of the Delta
Mendota Canal and California Aqueduct along the west side of the valley
(Sneed et al., 2013).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Diagram showing the relation between surface and subsurface
processes with linkage to land subsidence (Schmid et al., 2014; Hanson et
al., 2014).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/449/2015/piahs-372-449-2015-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Conjunctive use is the combined use of surface water and groundwater
(UNESCO, 2010). The evolution of conjunctive-use management has come to
include a framework of both natural and
anthropogenic components of surface water and groundwater resources. The
engineered components of supply and demand have become more sophisticated
and ubiquitous in the urban and agricultural landscape. Many of these
components such as canal operation, pumping of multiple-aquifer wells,
aquifer storage and recovery, and reuse have an effect on conjunctive-use
strategies. The connection to potential land subsidence has not been
systemically linked to key processes and hydraulic properties of groundwater
flow in order to understand the effects on conjunctive use. The feedback
from these and other components that are linked to conjunctive use may
require combined assessment within an integrated physically-based and
supply-and-demand modeling structure.</p>
      <p>Linking the effects of subsidence to changes in aquifer properties and other
components of the hydrologic landscape is critical to conjunctive-use
management. This type of analysis helps to identify and quantify the flow
capacities and limits that these components can bring to conjunctive use.
Flow capacities and limits may depend on aquifer head, other flow
components, or deformation, and, hence, cannot be directly quantified
through simple water allocation models. One of the current issues for
regions within which large amounts of surface water are transported via
canal systems is the potential effects on infrastructure from land
subsidence. In particular, reduced surface-water supplies owing to dry
climate and environmental constraints are being offset by additional
groundwater pumpage that can cause additional land subsidence. The feedback
from this cause-and-effect linkage within a conjunctive-use system is an
impairment of the conveyance and integrity of the canal systems as well as
changing related streamflows and runoff. Land subsidence and differential
land subsidence can affect elevations and slopes across the landscape, which
can result in reduction in freeboard, reduced or reversed slopes, and even
fractures in the canals. Similarly, the ability to convey natural
streamflow, deliver water for irrigation, return landscape runoff to
streams, or reuse such water is directly and indirectly affected by land
subsidence. Finally, the effects of land subsidence are also occurring in
the subsurface where compaction is releasing water from fine-grained
interbed storage and, as a result, aquifer systems suffer reduced storage
and transmission properties associated with the compaction.</p>
      <p>MODFLOW (MF) uses a modular approach to represent surface processes that can
interact with groundwater. In contrast to simulations that include only
head-dependent flows, the assessment of conjunctive-use problems requires
simulations with additional connectivity of flows of one stress term that
directly depend on flows of other stress terms. For the analysis of
deformation-dependent flows, a version of MODFLOW (MF) called MODFLOW-One
Water Hydrologic Model (MF-OWHM, Hanson and Schmid, 2013) has been developed
to include linkages between deformation, aquifer properties, and affected
flow terms.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Example of simulated changes in bed altitudes <bold>(a)</bold> along model
column 17 showing the final displacement of land surface and layer bottoms
using SUB-Link (dashed line initial surface and solid line final surface),
<bold>(b)</bold> with the deformable mesh using the Surface-water Routing Process of
MF-OWHM along the urban canal, and <bold>(c)</bold> Difference in streamflow between
using SUB-Link and using just SUB with no linkage (Schmid et al., 2014).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/449/2015/piahs-372-449-2015-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Coupled land subsidence</title>
      <p>In MF-OWHM (Hanson et al., 2014), new linkages were provided for the
Subsidence Package (SUB) (Hoffmann et al., 2003) with other packages and
processes in a fully integrated hydrologic model, which calculate flow rates
that are affected by the deformation of the land surface or
hydrostratigraphic boundaries (Fig. 1). The new capability allows MF-OWHM to
adjust elevations of the streambeds, canal and surface-water
control-structure elevations, the land surface used by various agricultural,
drain, and riparian evapotranspiration, and the tops and bottoms of aquifer
layers. These changes also affect secondary calculations, such as the slope
of a streambed, slope-related runoff in farms, proximity of the capillary
fringe to the root zone, and changing hydraulic properties (transmissivity
and storage coefficient) of aquifer layers (Fig. 2). The effects of these
deformation-dependent flows were first analyzed with respect to a
hypothetical problem that had typical properties and features (Schmid et
al., 2014). This analysis demonstrated significant effects from the direct
feedback of deformation onto physical properties of the land surface and
subsurface. The indirect feedback of deformation on conjunctive use is
facilitated by connecting the effects of layer deformation and associated
changed transmissivities to changes in groundwater, landscape, and surface
water flows. These, in turn, may affect changes in surface-water and
groundwater deliveries to farms. One might also consider a third level of
feedback of changes of surface-water and groundwater deliveries back to
further changes in subsidence. That is, for instance, a reduction in
surface-water deliveries might contribute to increased groundwater pumping
and thus increased subsidence.</p>
      <p>A realistic hypothetical example (Fig. 1) was used to explore and
demonstrate the effects of the subsidence linkage within a fully coupled
hydrologic model (Schmid et al., 2014). The coupling also affects the
differential deformation of each layer (Fig. 3a). The supply-and-demand
timing and amount of surface water available for conjunctive use is affected
within the valley, along the urban canal, and as an inflow to the downstream
valley (Fig. 3b). Finally, the stage (and related freeboard) and flows in
the urban canal are also adversely affected by land subsidence (Fig. 3b).
There are reductions in outflow of as much as 8 % during the summer months
and a reduction in stage elevation in the urban canal of as much as 0.62 m
that is potentially a reduction in freeboard simulated with the Surface
Water Routing Process (SWR). The reductions in flows and stage affect the
ability to deliver water through the urban canal and ultimately may also
affect inter-basin transfers as deformation affects the integrity of the
physical structures. The coupled deformation also affects water use and
movement across the landscape related to irrigation and urban deliveries.</p>
      <p>Substantial relative temporal and overall differences in streamflow occur at
diversions to (Fig. 3c) and return flows (Fig. 3c) from farms that affect
the amounts of surface water that is available to downstream farms for
irrigation. There are also increased deliveries and reduced return flows
during periods of subsidence. Thus, the amounts and sources of irrigation
water are altered and the amount of water that is potentially divertible
again for downstream farms is affected.</p>
      <p>A real world example is under development for the Central Valley of
California, where deformation of Delta Mendota Canal will be simulated by
using the updated and refined Central Valley Model (Faunt et al., 2011).
Examples of this development suggest that there are significant effects on
the gradient of the canal and the bottom elevation, as well as differential
elevation along the canal.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p>The vertical displacement of the land surface and model-layer tops and
bottoms calculated by the MODFLOW Subsidence Package has been linked to
other MODFLOW packages and processes that are affected by the altitude and
slope of the land surface as well as by the model layer thicknesses. In a
model of a hypothetical aquifer system, these feedback effects of land
surface and mesh deformation were found to be significant. The effects were
large enough spatially and temporally to affect the supply-and-demand
components of conjunctive water use. Thus, modeling deformation-dependent
flows and hydraulic properties may be necessary to investigate the rate
limiting aspects of conjunctive water use for a variety of flows in
subsidence prone regions. In addition, the modeled feedback of
deformation-dependent flows resulted in increased or decreased supplies and
reduced or increased groundwater pumpage. That is, in some regions changes
in land surface could either enhance or impede the use and movement of
water.</p>
      <p>The effects of feedback onto the land surface and aquifers from mesh
deformation with MF-OWHM flow terms were found to be significant when
compared to simulations without the subsidence linkage. The inclusion of
land subsidence resulted in an even larger difference when compared to
simulations that did not consider land subsidence for a hypothetical
alluvial aquifer that is subject to sustained agricultural and urban demand
that drive related secondary effects such as land subsidence. Therefore,
these linkages are best suited for evaluating conjunctive water use where
the vertical displacements or differential displacements may affect the
sources of water, the proportions of multiple sources of water, as well as
their use and movement across the landscape, the performance of conveyance
through canals and rivers across the landscape, and the flow to and from the
aquifers. Future work will involve applying methods described here to a
real-world model of the Central Valley of California, USA.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Faunt, C. C., Hanson, R. T., Belitz, K., Schmid, W., Predmore, S. P., Rewis,
D. L., and McPherson, K. R.: Numerical model of the hydrologic landscape and
groundwater flow in California's Central Valley (Chapter C), in: Groundwater Availability of the Central Valley Aquifer, edited by:
Faunt, C. C.,  California,
U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1776, 121e212, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Faunt, C., Hanson, R., Martin, P., and Schmid, W.: Planned Updates and
Refinements to the Central Valley Hydrologic Model with an Emphasis on
Improving the Simulation of Land Subsidence in the San Joaquin Valley, World
Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2011, 864e870, 2011.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Hanson, R. T. and Schmid, W.: Economic resilience through
“One-Water” Management, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report
2013–1175, p. 2,  2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Hanson, R. T., Flint, L. E., Flint, A. L., Dettinger, M. D., Faunt, C. C., Cayan,
D., and Schmid, W.: A method for physically based model analysis of
conjunctive use in response to potential climate changes, Water Resour. Res.,
48, 23, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010774" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011WR010774</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Hanson, R. T., Boyce, S. E., Schmid, W., Hughes, J. D., Mehl, S. M.,
Leake, S. A., Maddock III, T., and Niswonger, R. G.:
MODFLOW-One-Water Hydrologic Flow Model (OWHM), U.S. Geological Survey
Techniques and Methods 6-A51, p. 122 (<uri>http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/tm6a51/</uri>)
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffmann, J., Leake, S. A., Galloway, D. L., and Wilson, A. M.: MODFLOW-2000
Groundwater Model–user Guide to the Subsidence and Aquifer-system
Compaction (SUB) Package, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 03e233, 46
pp., 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Schmid, W., Hanson, R. T., Hughes, J., Leake, S. A., and Niswonger, R.:
Feedback of land subsidence on the movement and conjunctive use of
water resources, Environ. Modell. Softw., 62, 253–270, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Sneed, M., Brandt, J., and Solt, M.: Land subsidence along
the Delta-Mendota Canal in the northern part of the San Joaquin Valley,
California, 2003–10, U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations
Report 2013–5142, p. 87, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20135142" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3133/sir20135142</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>UNESCO: United Nations Organization for Education, Science and Culture
(UNESCO) Glossary,
<uri>http://webworld.unesco.org/water/ihp/db/glossary/glu/EN/GF0237EN.HTM</uri> (last access: 1 August 2014) 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
