<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \bartext{Prevention and mitigation of natural and anthropogenic hazards due to land subsidence}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">PIAHS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">PIAHS</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Proc. IAHS</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2199-899X</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/piahs-372-211-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Land subsidence of clay deposits after the Tohoku-Pacific Ocean Earthquake</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Land subsidence of clay deposits after the Tohoku-Pacific Ocean Earthquake}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{K.~Yasuhara and M.~Kazama}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Yasuhara</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
          <email>kazuya.yasuhara.0927@vc.ibaraki.ac.jp</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Kazama</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute for Global Change Adaptation Science, Ibaraki
University, 2-1-1 Bunkyo, Mito, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Ibaraki,  310-8512, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira
Aoba-ku Sendai-shi, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>  Miyagi, 980-8577, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">K. Yasuhara (kazuya.yasuhara.0927@vc.ibaraki.ac.jp)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>November</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>372</volume>
      <issue>372</issue>
      <fpage>211</fpage><lpage>216</lpage>
      
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/211/2015/piahs-372-211-2015.html">This article is available from https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/211/2015/piahs-372-211-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/211/2015/piahs-372-211-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/211/2015/piahs-372-211-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Extensive infrastructure collapse resulted from the cataclysmic earthquake
that struck off the eastern coast of Japan on 11 March  2011 and from its
consequent gigantic tsunami, affecting not only the Tohoku region but also
the Kanto region. Among the geological and geotechnical processes observed,
land subsidence occurring in both coastal and inland areas and from Tohoku
to Kanto is an extremely important issue that must be examined carefully.
This land subsidence is classifiable into three categories: (i) land sinking
along the coastal areas because of tectonic movements, (ii) settlement of
sandy deposits followed by liquefaction, and (iii) long-term post-earthquake
recompression settlement in soft clay caused by dissipation of excess pore
pressure. This paper describes two case histories of post-earthquake
settlement of clay deposits from among the three categories of ground
sinking and land subsidence because such settlement has been frequently
overlooked in numerous earlier earthquakes. Particularly, an attempt is made
to propose a methodology for predicting such settlement and for formulating
remedial or responsive measures to mitigate damage from such settlement.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Land subsidence and ground sinking are as remarkable and extremely severe
phenomena as the gigantic tsunami that struck Tohoku and Kanto in Japan
after the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake (hereinafter the
“Tohoku Earthquake”). Moreover, the mechanisms of both events are
extremely complex because several factors induced land subsidence and ground
sinking from tectonic, geologic, and geotechnical aspects, exerting
overlapping influences that persist even now, four years after the
earthquake.</p>
      <p>Roughly speaking, this land subsidence and ground sinking is classifiable
into three categories: (i) land sinking along coastal areas because of
tectonic movements (Imakiire and Koarai, 2012, Yasuhara et al., 2012;, (ii) settlement of sandy deposits followed by liquefaction, and (iii) long-term
post-earthquake recompression settlement in soft clays caused by the
dissipation of excess pore pressure. Land sinking described in category (i) induces inundation of wide coastal areas, particularly during severe
storm-surges and strong typhoons. However, land subsidence in the latter two
categories (ii) and (iii) occurs in inland areas, strongly influencing local
residents. A difference is apparent between the mechanisms of settlement of
both types in that settlement included in category (ii) is related to
saturated sandy deposits, whereas settlement in category (iii) is associated
with saturated clayey deposits, which cause them to take a long time to
cease. Based on differences among the causes and mechanisms related to the
three kinds of land subsidence described above, suitable countermeasures
against subsidence should be taken, corresponding to their different
characteristics.</p>
      <p>This paper presents two case histories of post-earthquake settlement of clay
deposits from among the three categories of ground sinking and land
subsidence described above because normally such settlement has been
overlooked in numerous historical earthquakes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Post-earthquake settlement of cohesive soil deposits in Miyagi</title>
      <p>Generally speaking, liquefaction-induced settlement described in the
previous section ceases in a very short time. As described later,
post-earthquake long-term settlement is caused mainly by consolidation of
clayey soils situated under sand deposits simply because the hydraulic
conductivity of clay layers is much lower than that of sand deposits. For
that reason, a long time is necessary for the dissipation of excess pore
pressure generated during earthquakes (Yasuhara et al., 2001; Yasuhara and
Matsuda, 2002; Matsuda et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>Figure 1 depicts the variations of settlement at bench marks after 1974, when
the total amount of settlement was greater than 200 mm up to 2010.
Settlement measuring locations are benchmarks located in the eastern part of
Sendai on the Quaternary alluvial lower plain of unconsolidated layers of
around 50 m. It is apparent from Fig. 1 that a sudden increase of settlement
occurred after the 1978 Miyagioki Earthquake. It then progressed at a higher
rate of settlement than before the earthquake. The sudden increase of
settlement in 1978 resulted from the collapse of clay soil particle
structures: an immediate effect of the earthquake action.</p>
      <p>Acceleration of post-earthquake settlement as shown in Fig. 1 originated
from the superimposition of land subsidence before the earthquake and
consolidation settlement caused by the dissipation of excess pore pressure
generated during the earthquake.</p>
      <p>Figure 2 depicts an example of variations of settlement over time before and
after the Tohoku Earthquake in 2011. The tendency presented in Fig. 2 is
almost identical as that presented previously in Fig. 1.</p>
      <p>Kazama (2014) reported that post-earthquake settlement of clay deposits are
caused by collapse of clay soil particle structures immediately after the
earthquake and the recovery of collapsed structures to the new state of clay
structures This mechanism for post-earthquake settlement of clay soils is
understood from Fig. 3, which portrays the progress of settlement in the
form of void ratio, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. logarithmic of vertical stress,  log <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. To validate the
proposed concept for estimating post-earthquake settlement, undrained cyclic
triaxial tests followed by drainage were conducted by Kazama using
undisturbed and remolded clay specimens taken from the site where settlement
had taken place. Subsequently, the results from undrained cyclic triaxial
tests followed by drainage under the conditions of 0.4 for cyclic stress
ratio and 0.2 Hz. for cyclic frequency are presented for comparison in Fig. 3 along with results from odometer tests on the undisturbed and remolded
specimens of the same clay as that used in cyclic triaxial tests.</p>
      <p>Void ratios after termination of undrained cyclic triaxial tests followed by
drainage are shown on the vertical line corresponding to the consolidation
pressure with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">log</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> curves in Fig. 3. Three dotted circles are shown
after each undrained loading followed by drainage, which simulates the
circumstances under which three earthquakes struck separately after some intervals.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Examples of land subsidence variation in Sendai before and after the earthquake.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/211/2015/piahs-372-211-2015-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Variation of settlement before and after the Tohoku Earthquake
(at Kamomachi of Sendai).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/211/2015/piahs-372-211-2015-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Void ratio vs. consolidation pressure relations for prediction of post-earthquake settlement of clay deposits (from Kazama, 2014).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/211/2015/piahs-372-211-2015-f03.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>If initial void ratios under a current consolidation pressure <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
undisturbed and remolded conditions corresponds to cases before and after
the earthquakes are assumed as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, then
post-earthquake settlement <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">post</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given as
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">post</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for the clay layer height. If one assumes 2.15 and 1.85 for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, and 10 m for the clay layer height,
then one obtains 47.6 cm for post-earthquake settlement <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">post</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Another methodology can be used to estimate the post-earthquake settlement
of clay layers proposed by Yasuhara et al. (1991, 2001). It is given as
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">post</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.225</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cy</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for the compression index of clay soil, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> signifies the
clay layer height, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cy</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents excess pore pressure generated by the
earthquake, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the consolidation or overburden pressure.
When we take values from Fig. xx  for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cy</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as 1.06,
5.0 m, 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 110 kN m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, then we obtain 33.9 cm for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">post</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is assumed here for calculation using Eq. (2) that the
normalized excess pore pressure in the clay layer, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cy</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 0.5.
Therefore, the amount of settlement will be less than this value, 05, when
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cy</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is smaller than 0.5. The amount of settlement of 33.9 cm obtained
using Eq. (2) is less than the 47.6 cm obtained using Eq. (1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Post-earthquake settlement of cohesive soil deposits in Ibaraki</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Outlines of post-earthquake settlement of residential areas beside the
River Dykes</title>
      <p>Another case study in Ibaraki is that where clay deposits near the river
dyke have undergone post-earthquake settlement causing damage to many
private residences. The horizontal profile of the river dyke and the
residential areas portrayed in Fig. 4 indicate a thick clay layer with xx m
deposits on the sand layer with the higher ground water level (GWL).
clay is characterized by the following.
Highly sensitive with high liquidity index
High water content with high undrained strength
Post-earthquake settlement is expected to result from consolidation followed
by dissipation of excess pore pressures generated by a strong earthquake.
The average index properties of clay are presented in Table 1. This</p>
      <p>Characteristic (ii) does not make sense from geotechnical perspective. It is
extremely unusual although characteristic (i) does make sense. This clay has
high structures of clay particles, which readily undergo deformation by
disturbance, leading to radical deformation and settlement. For comparison
with Kujikawa clay, Table 1 also includes index properties of Joban clay,
deposited beneath the Kanda area of Joban express highway, which was
constructed almost 35 years ago. Both clays are similar: both are highly
plastic and become considerably soft with water contents beyond the liquid
limit, although it cannot be said that the water content of either clay is
very high.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Index properties of clay beneath river dykes in Ibaraki.</p></caption>
  <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/211/2015/piahs-372-211-2015-t01.jpg"/>
</table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Geological profile of the objective site.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/211/2015/piahs-372-211-2015-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>A set of typical observed settlement vs. time relations continuously before
and after the earthquake is presented in Fig. 5. Settlement before the
earthquake is caused mainly by land subsidence because of ground water
abstraction. However, settlement after the earthquake is
very complex but perhaps caused by combining the following:
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>i.</label><p>land sinking by crustal movement,</p></list-item><list-item><label>ii.</label><p>immediate settlement followed by liquefaction of upper sand deposits,
which is
not time-dependent, and</p></list-item><list-item><label>iii.</label><p>time-dependent settlement of clay followed by dissipation of excess pore
pressure generated by earthquakes.</p></list-item></list>
Those two components are present in addition to land subsidence.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Settlement vs. time curves of river dykes.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/211/2015/piahs-372-211-2015-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Settlement vs. time curves for residences.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/211/2015/piahs-372-211-2015-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The current paper, however, addresses issue (iii) because it emphasizes an
examination of post-earthquake time-dependent settlement of clay deposits,
which corresponds to the latter part of the settlement vs. time curves
depicted in Fig. 6. The rates of settlement before and after the earthquake
are quite noticeable. The settlement has been exacerbated by earthquakes
because of the post-earthquake settlement of clay deposits caused by delayed
dissipation of excess pore pressure in clay deposits after the earthquake.
Generally speaking, such settlement takes a long time to cease. Therefore,
it is necessary for engineers and researchers to ascertain when the rate of
residual settlement after the earthquake becomes negligible for residents
not to feel at risk in everyday life.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Results from settlement monitoring and numerical analysis</title>
      <p>Since 2007, the Governmental Office in charge of river management in the
objective area has been monitoring variations of settlement with time inside
and outside the river dykes. Results of settlement monitoring indicate the
following:
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>i.</label><p>Settlement of residences accumulated up to 14 cm for the prior six years
starting in 2007.</p></list-item><list-item><label>ii.</label><p>Settlement increased to around 2 cm after
the earthquake in 2011.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p>According to elasto-visco-plastic two-dimensional numerical analysis for
settlement of river dykes and residences conducted in addition to settlement
monitoring:
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>i.</label><p>The predicted total settlement of river dykes will be greater than
90 cm.</p></list-item><list-item><label>ii.</label><p>Settlement must persist for more than 30 years.</p></list-item><list-item><label>iii.</label><p>Inclination of residences also continues for a long time.</p></list-item></list></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Remediation for reducing post-earthquake settlement of soft clay deposits.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://piahs.copernicus.org/articles/372/211/2015/piahs-372-211-2015-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Effects of damage mitigation countermeasures</title>
      <p>To prevent the effects of river dykes on post-earthquake settlement of
residences, the following countermeasures were undertaken (see Fig. 7).
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>i.</label><p>Remove 2.2 m of dykes to reduce dyke self-weight.</p></list-item><list-item><label>ii.</label><p>Thereafter install sheet piles aside from the river dykes into the hard
stratus, called A<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> layers, to intercept the effects of river dyke
self-weight on residences.</p></list-item><list-item><label>iii.</label><p>Return the dyke height to the original height with 4.1 m.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p>As might be readily apparent from the results depicted in Figs. 5 and 6,
the following behavior was observed after carrying out the countermeasures
stated above.
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>i.</label><p>Remaining excess pore pressure on grounds both outside and inside the dykes
became less than that before partial removal of dykes.</p></list-item><list-item><label>ii.</label><p>Installation of sheet piles is associated with increased ground settlements
beneath the dykes, but does not increase settlement of the ground outside
the dykes, but rather might decrease settlement of the ground of residents.</p></list-item><list-item><label>iii.</label><p>Filling up to the original height of dykes decreased settlement of the
ground of residents because of the intercept of stress distribution of dykes
to residential ground.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p>As a summary of the tendencies stated above, probably the countermeasures
adopted herein have been effective to date for reducing post-earthquake
settlement of residents near the river dykes. However, monitoring of
settlements should be conducted because the influence of groundwater
abstraction on continuous settlement of residential areas remains uncertain.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>The paper presents an outline of the present situation of ground sinking,
land subsidence, and settlement induced by tectonic movements on a global
scale and ground movements on a local scale induced by the Tohoku Earthquake
in 2011. Particularly, the paper describes a specific examination of
post-earthquake settlement of clay layers observed in some locations in the
Tohoku and Kanto regions. This paper describes two case histories related to
this category of settlement: One in Miyagi for a methodology for predicting
settlement and another in Ibaraki for effective countermeasures for
settlement. Investigation of the two case histories suggests that careful
attention should be devoted to the fact that such settlement is
time-dependent and that monitoring of settlement should therefore continue
for a long period. These phenomena show different tendencies from those of
two kinds of settlement originating from tectonic movement, followed by
liquefaction.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are grateful for financial support from a Grant-in-Aid for
Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
and Technology (FY2014–FY2017, Project No. 26281055), Japan, whose
representative is  Makoto Tamura, Associate Professor of Ibaraki
University, Japan.</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Imakiire, T. and Koarai, M.: Wide-area land subsidence caused by
“the 2011 OFF the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake”,   Soils Found.,
52, 842–855, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Joint Editorial Committee in Tohoku Branch for the Report on the Great East
Japan Earthquake Disaster 2013,  Part 3 Geo-hazards, Ch. 8, Land sinking and
inundation, 3-212–3-218, 2013  (in
Japanese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Kazama, M.: Geotechnical subjects seen to the damage of the 2011 off
the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake, Proc. 11th Symp. on Ground
Improvement, Journal of Material Science, Japan,   1–20, 2014 (in Japanese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Matsuda, H., Nhan, T. T., Nakahara, D., Thien, D. Q., and Tuyen, T. H.:
Post-cyclic recompression characteristics of a clay subjected to undrained
uni0directional and multi-directional cyclic shears, Proc. 10th US
National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Eng. Research
Institute, Anchorage, AK, 2014.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Ohara, S. and Matsuda, H.: Study on the settlement of saturated clay
layer induced by cyclic shear,   Soils Found.,  28,  103–113,
1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Yasuhara, K. and Andersen, K. H.:  Recompression of normally
consolidated clay after cyclic loading,   Soils Found.,   J.  JGS,  31,
83–94, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Yasuhara, K. and Matsuda, H.: 5. Dynamic properties of cohesive
soils, J. of Japan Geotechnical Society,   46,      59–64, 1998 (in
Japanese).
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Yasuhara, K. and Usui, T.: Potential application of geosynthetics for
reconstruction following coastal land subsidence induced by the Great East
Japan Earthquake, Geosynthetics Journal, Japan Chapter of IGS,   27,
69–77, 2012 (in Japanese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Yasuhara, K., Murakami, S., Toyota, N. and Hyde, A. F. L.:
Settlements in fine-grained soils under cyclic loading,   Soils Found.,  J. of JGS,  41,
25–36, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
